Five Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) legislators will join a financial delegation led by People First Party (PFP) Legislator Christina Liu (劉憶如) to an economic symposium in China. Even if we disregard the question of whether or not it would be appropriate, a joint visit by DPP and PFP legislators, and to China of all places, is still strange.
I have two questions. First, the PFP has constantly been blocking the government's policies, so why this sudden willingness to cooperate? Second, PFP Chairman James Soong (宋楚瑜) took the white flag of surrender with him on his kowtowing trip to China, and Liu has since visited China several times, and that is all fine. But now that Liu is bringing DPP legislators along with her, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) will credit the PFP. So why does the DPP increase its troubles by increasing the PFP's capital?
Legislator Gao Jyh-peng (高志鵬), one of the DPP group going to China, said that the purpose of the visit was to study "the mainland." But President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) has defined the relationship between Taiwan and China as being that of "one country on each side of the Taiwan Strait," so why this talk of "the mainland?"
There is talk of financial policy, the financial system and listening to China-based Taiwanese businesspeople -- everything has been done to eliminate the political implications. These people have been in politics for so long, but they still don't understand that when a legislator visits China, that action is political in and of itself. Even if they go to China with their eyes shut, ears muffled and mouths gagged, the fact that they go is still political.
China is a totalitarian, despotic and anti-democratic country, and regardless of in what name one participates in some symposium, the main consideration should be whether or not it is opposing these facts. If it isn't, participation is the same as adding credibility to a gang of butchers who suppress their own people and human rights. Any decision to go or not to go to China is a human-rights decision.
This depth of reasoning may of course be lost on politicians. Let's instead apply the logic of power. From this perspective it is even dafter of DPP legislators to follow in the footsteps of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Lien Chan (連戰) and Soong. DPP members from Chen on down severely criticized Lien and Soong for kneeling down before Chinese President Hu Jintao (胡錦濤), while the Taiwanese public was angered. With the "Anti-Secession" Law hanging like the sword of Damocles over our heads, Lien and Soong's visits were an endorsment of China.
By traveling to China, the DPP legislators are endorsing Lien and Soong's visits -- something not even a stupid person would do.
The five DPP legislators have borrowed from the pan-blue camp's apologists, saying that those opposing their visit are sealing Taiwan off from the outside world. Saying that opposition to China is the same as sealing off the country is bizarre. Turning China down is not the same as wanting to seal Taiwan off from the outside world.
As former Czech president Vaclav Havel stressed in a May 24 lecture in the US in which he condemned China for threatening Taiwan and Tibet, "We must do all we can to support those who dare come forth and face despotic regimes."
Chin Heng-wei is editor-in-chief of Contemporary Monthly magazine.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.