I'd like to contribute to the ongoing debate on English proficiency in Taiwan.
I completely agree with Adam Coates and Bruce Yang's responses to the comments made by Scott Austin about Taiwan. Austin should not complain and this is why: I'm a Chinese person who was born and raised in India, but I now consider Taiwan my home country. While in India, I always thought I was Chinese due to my ethnic background and also due to my features, until I came to Taiwan.
I realized that I was more Indian than Chinese as I speak Mandarin with an accent. Although I speak fluent English, albeit with a slight Indian accent, many Taiwanese who could not speak one sentence of proper English looked at me condescendingly and with prejudice because I did not speak American English and because I came from India, not North America or Europe.
I believe that English should be used to communicate, rather than as a status symbol. There's no point in emphasizing "North American" English because there are many more countries in the world that use English on a daily basis.
I tried to work as an English teacher here but failed terribly at it, partly due to the fact that I am not Caucasian. I assume that Austin is Caucasian, and by just this measure, he was probably more successful than me. It was through this experience that one realizes the Taiwanese consider Caucasians superior because of the color of their skin or the shape of their eyes.
Lastly, I feel that all these discussions between native English speakers are pointless when the discussion is about the Taiwanese people. It's not likely that many Taiwanese have read what Austin wrote in this letter, so their opinions will remain unknown. I think that the Taipei Times should translate into Mandarin some letters it receives from losers like Austin, and print them in the Liberty Times in order to get reactions from the general public.
Taiwan’s status in the world community is experiencing something really different; it’s being treated like a normal country. And not just a “normal” country, more like a valuable, constructive, democratic and generous country. This is not simply an artifact of Taiwan’s successes in combatting the novel coronavirus. It is a new attitude, weighing Taiwan’s democracy against China’s lack of it. Before I continue, I should apologize to the readers of the Taipei Times. I have not visited Taipei since the opening of the American Institute in Taiwan’s new chancery building in Neihu last year, so I was unprepared for the photograph
On Sept. 27, 2002, the Democratic Republic of Timor-Leste (East Timor) joined the UN to become its 191st member. Since then, two other nations have joined, Montenegro on June 28, 2006, and South Sudan on July 14, 2011. The combined total of the populations of these three nations is just more than half that of Taiwan’s 23.7 million people. East Timor has 1.3 million, Montenegro has slightly more than half a million and South Sudan has 10.9 million. They all are members of the UN, yet much more populous Taiwan is denied membership. Of the three, East Timor, as a Southeast Asian
At a June 12 news conference held by the Talent Circulation Alliance to announce the release of its white paper for this year, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) emphasized that, in this era of globalization, Taiwan should focus on improving foreign language and digital abilities when cultivating talent, so that it stands out from global competitors. I suggest the government should consider building a professional translation industry. If the public believes that there is a relationship between learning English and national competitiveness, then the nation must consider the social cost of language education. This should be assessed to maximise educational effectiveness: Is
Taiwan has for decades singlehandedly borne the brunt of a revanchist, ultra-nationalist China — until now. Ever since Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison had the temerity to call for a transparent, international investigation into the origins of the COVID-19 pandemic, Beijing has been turning the screws on Canberra. This has included unleashing aggressive “wolf warrior” diplomats to intimidate Australian policymakers, enacting punitive tariffs on its exports, and threatening an embargo on Chinese tourists and students to the nation. A tense situation became more serious on June 19 after Morrison revealed that a “sophisticated state-based actor” — read: China — had launched a