I do not know if we get the dinosaurs we deserve, but we certainly get the dinosaurs we desire. Once, they were known by their gigantism and monstrous power, by their claws and armored plates, their incisors and grotesque skulls. They earned their names: thunder lizard (brontosaurus), carnivorous bull (carnotaurus), three-horned face (triceratops). They were primal forces erupting from the planet's crust, relics of a brutal past.
Now, we have something else in mind. The extraordinary exhibition at the American Museum of Natural History, "Dinosaurs: Ancient Fossils, New Discoveries," for example, opens with a recently discovered skeleton of a birdlike dinosaur named after a gentle Disneyesque deer: Bambiraptor.
And that's not the least of it. Where once scales and armor predominated, now there is discussion of feathers and soft tissue. Instead of being associated with earthbound reptiles, dinosaurs are being linked with ethereal birds. Their speed has been ramped down, their delicacy pumped up. Their earthen colors have turned spectacular. The male archetype once ruled, now the female one does. And even their extinction -- once proof of thuggish inadequacy -- is now a sign of mere victimhood: They were apparently wiped out in a mass extinction caused by a comet hitting the earth.
This exhibition genteelly pins the old dinosaur image to the ground, overwhelming its primitive brawn with contemporary brain power and technological advances, revealing its soft underbelly. With great care, it manages to almost completely overturn the ways dinosaurs were once understood. The only concern is that in ways we cannot yet know, the new interpretations may be making some of the same mistakes as the old.
The transformation has been taking place for the last few decades, but it has picked up pace recently, with the computerized tomography (CT) scanning of fossils, computer simulations of muscle movement and remarkable new finds, including remnants of soft tissue. Fossils discovered in Liaoning Province in China have also, as the exhibition shows, revealed new information about fine details of skin and feather. So some of the transformations in the image of dinosaurs clearly come from an increase in understanding.
FAMILIAR CHANGES
Some of the changes, too, have become relatively familiar. A generation of purple Barney puppets has already been worn out. Children's books long ago turned dinosaurs into empathetic companions, fellow travelers in a natural world before civilization or socialization.
A dozen years ago, Steven Spielberg's Jurassic Park may have even been a kind of rebellion against this trend of treating dinosaurs as E.T.-like proto-pets -- safely contained inhabitants of a Disney fantasy. The effort to show them with all their monstrous powers intact backfired, of course. Jurassic Park was really a kind of a thrill ride -- which it later literally became. The movie did not restore the threat of dinosaurs; instead, they were tamed by commerce.
At Toys "R" Us in Times Square, a giant Tyrannosaurus rex opens his mouth, roars and twists his head and tail, his eyeballs ominously roving over the photo-snapping visitors, inviting them up a ramp to purchase Jurassic Park products.
But it is clear enough that the old image, popularized in pulp sci-fi and film, could not have sustained itself, even if scientific research had continued to uphold it. Dinosaur skeletons, which were first mounted for public display in 1868, once held immense significance. There is hardly a major country that doesn't have such skeletons on view. US president Thomas Jefferson used the East Room of the White House as his Bone Room. Industrialist Andrew Carnegie sponsored excavations that led to the discovery of the Diplodocus carnegii -- and then donated replicas and casts to museums in South America and Europe.
RELICS OF POWER
Such fossils were relics of power. And they offered Darwinian testimony. For all their strength, the theory went, dinosaurs had heads that were too minute to be of much use after mammalian brains became dominant. The dinosaurs were supplanted, their fossilized remains serving like the skulls of vanquished enemies, mounted on poles around a temple, occasionally coming back to life in popular fantasy.
Of course, that fearsome image also grew out of the knowledge of its time and changing knowledge, which for example, later identified the Brontosaurus with the Apatosaurus. Now we learn, based on new computer simulations involving muscle mass and joints, that the T. Rex probably could not have chased after that jeep in Jurassic Park, that its top running speed was probably closer to 16kph than 72kph. And that the bulbous skulls of pachycephalosaurids were probably too thin to support the old idea that they would butt heads in combat like today's bighorn sheep. One new dinosaur modeled here is named Confuciusornis sanctus -- sacred Confucius bird -- which is about as far from a thunder lizard as you can get.
"What's the point?" asks one of the signs along a mock trophy wall of elaborate skulls with baroque spikes and horns and frills of bone. "You might think these animals were aggressive, fierce fighters."
But the ceratopsians, we learn, were actually sluggish plant-eaters who moved in herds. Even the famous spikes of the Stegosaurus are now thought to have been far too weak to be useful as armor or weaponry.
"So why all the sharp points?" the exhibition asks. For display, not defense. "Flirt or fight?" another sign asks. Here the emphasis is on flirt: the fearsome skulls and spikes and collars were used for "dramatic courtship displays."
One still wouldn't want to meet these creatures on an open plain, and the surviving teeth of even the wisest of them look as if they could still do substantial damage. But perhaps there is some comfort to be had in imagining that they were alert beings, sensitive to ecological disaster, more preoccupied with mating than mastery. Presumably, somewhat like ourselves.
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry