Japan has long agreed to negotiate over fishing disputes with Taiwan, and vessels from the Coast Guard Administration have been asserting Taiwan's interests in disputed waters. But the media has sought to give the topic maximum exposure, inflaming public sentiment.
The result is that the government has been unable to resist pressure from certain members of the legislature, and on June 21, Minister of National Defense Lee Jye (
First, maritime resource conservation, maritime delimitation and sovereignty disputes should not be confused with one another. Disputes in the international community should be settled peacefully, and the same also applies to disputes caused by overlapping maritime claims.
This spirit of peace is expressed in the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea, and is also expressed in the Law of the Exclusive Economic Zone and the Continental Shelf of the Republic of China (
A majority of Taiwanese commentators and the media, however, seem to ignore an important fact: the Taiwan-Japan fishery talks over the past have been practical discussions over maintaining the industry, rather than political discussions about maritime delimitation. This is because both sides know that such delimitation can carry deep political implications, and given the current political situation, Taiwan and Japan know that any agreement is unlikely.
But, considering the urgency of fishery conservation and management, both countries have agreed to negotiate a provisional arrangement, under international law and relevant domestic legal regulations, based on a spirit of mutual understanding and cooperation, to ensure the sustainability of shared fishery resources in disputed waters.
Second, the use of warships as a diplomatic tool to force two sides of a maritime dispute to the negotiating table has been tried before, and has proved successful on certain occasions. But when the issue is fishery conservation and management, the suitability of such means is open to question. The use of coast guard vessels would not only have been less controversial, it could have achieved the same goal.
Nobody wants a war, and most don't believe that the deployment of the naval vessels would precipitate a war. There seems to be a consensus that the use of these vessels would merely be a protest to show Taiwan's determination, forcing Japan back to the negotiating table. So why -- after the Japanese had already agreed to talks -- should the naval vessels be deployed, creating a great fuss over something that had already been agreed upon?
Third, the crux of the recent dispute is about how to ensure Taiwanese fishermen's rights to operate in disputed waters. The leaders of Fishermen's Association pointed out that within the overlapping economic zone, both states can share the same resources.
Faced with today's issues of fishery conservation and management, most fishermen, who are kindhearted and left without alternatives, may not want to complicate the current situation by heightening it to the level of political confrontation.
The navy's intervention can display Taiwan's military strength and the government's determination, but, in the current phase, has only served to arouse strong nationalist sentiment on both sides. The slightest mismanagement of the situation could lead to a political dispute in which protecting national dignity became an issue. If this were to happen, both sides would have little room to maneuver. It would also be harmful to fishery conservation, management and fishermen's rights.
That public awareness of the plight of disadvantaged fishermen has been raised is one of the positive aspects of this incident, especially as Taiwanese have been indifferent to the importance of the ocean.
But the emphasis of the incident has tended to move away from overall maritime policy, especially the protection of the fishing interests of those fishermen. If the government cannot respond cautiously, and politicians continue to pour oil on the flames, this will not benefit the nation.
Now that our navy has been called out, all that common people like us can do is pray for Taiwan.
Chiang Huang-chih is an associate professor in the College of Law at National Taiwan University.
TRANSLATED BY LIN YA-TI
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.