Last week, after a seven-year hiatus, the National Energy Conference re-convened and ended after two days. During this brief conference, what we saw in the media was merely snippets of news of protests lodged by environmental groups. Most of the viewers or readers have failed to understand why these environmental activists threw a tantrum during the meeting, as a result of lack of in-depth and professional coverage of such an issue. It saddens us to know that the conclusion over emissions drawn by the participants is regressive in comparison with that of 1998.
In 1998, when the KMT was still in power, it convened the first-ever national energy conference in response to the Kyoto Protocol. The 39 industrial countries included in the protocol were expected to reduce emissions to 95 percent of the 1990 level by the 2008-2012 period. Although Taiwan is not a signatory to the protocol, it must take early measures to adjust its industrial structure in order to meet the new regulations. Therefore, in 1998, the resolution passed by the National Energy conference concluded that the nation should reduce emissions to the 2000 level by 2020.
Last week, in response to the Kyoto Protocol, which came into effect in February, the Democratic Progress Party's (DPP) government held another National Energy Conference and confirmed that since 2000, Taiwan's carbon dioxide emissions have skyrocketed to 276 million tones from 221 million tonnes, an annual average growth of 6 percent, the highest in the world. The basic measures that the government should have implemented long ago, such as auditing, reducing industrial CO2 emissions and creating mechanisms for reporting and reducing emissions.
What is even more startling is that no government official has apologized for this dereliction of duty, let alone been punished. Instead, officials have adopted the irresponsible attitude that the situation has changed and that the original goals are simply no longer attainable. They are now calling for a "practical" and "feasible" program to reduce emissions. Since government agencies such as the Ministry of Economic Affairs have wasted seven crucial years, of course the original goals have become impossible. If the government is resolved to sack the negligent officials and reflect on missed opportunities, it might be able to make up for lost time. However, we can see that last week's National Energy Conference did not even bother to set a target, and only agreed to allow each government department to assess the extent of improvement they are able to achieve.
The spirit of the Kyoto Protocol is to regulate global emissions, and each country must do its best to fulfill its responsibilities to the planet. Why the Ministry of Economic Affairs recklessly came to such a ridiculous conclusion is simply an attempt to protect the highly contaminating iron, steel, petroleum and chemical industries. Since the output of these industries is far more than we ourselves need, we should no longer abuse our precious environmental resources simply to meet export demand. The Kyoto Protocol does not only put pressure on Taiwan to reduce pollution, but also to transform its industrial structure away from highly polluting industries.
The most encouraging aspect of the two-day National Energy Convention was to see people from the renewable energy sector calling for the government to provide more funding and resources for research. We believe that only environmentally friendly industries are able to upgrade the economy of the nation.
Instead, the government is elated at the number of job opportunities that the Formosa Group's steel plants and eighth naphtha cracker will create.
Yenwen Peng and Wenyen Hsu are central executive commissioners of the Green Party.
Translated by Daniel Cheng
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.