It was reddish soil on the feet of Sherlock Holmes' sidekick that told the detective, in The Sign of Four, that Dr. Watson had been to the post office. In real-life crimes, too, color is one way that forensic scientists analyze soil from a crime scene or suspect. They can also check mineral composition, the density of the soil and its pollen content. But because of the cost of using experts with the requisite skill and experience, these techniques are usually used only in serious crimes.
Now, scientists in New Zealand hope that solving crimes will be made easier and cheaper with a technique that aims to use soil and the bugs within it as a new "fingerprint" for crime. The team at the Institute of Environmental Science and Research (ESR), led by environmental microbiologist Jacqui Horswell, has developed a system that uses DNA analysis of the bacteria in soil to match samples.
"Because we can now compare the entire community [of bacteria] using DNA, we reckon we can code a soil sample based on this DNA community. So all we are looking at is the bacteria of the soil," Horswell said.
To obtain a profile of the bacteria in the soil, the ESR team looks at a protein-making gene called 16S rRNA. It is a technique used regularly in environmental studies, called "terminal length restriction fragment polymorphism." What the Horswell team has done is apply it to forensics.
Once the scientists have extracted the DNA from the bacteria in the soil, they use a biological photocopier, PCR, to make copies of the DNA of the 16S rRNA gene. The next step is chop up the copies into different lengths, and it is those differing lengths, when graphed, that give the peaks which are the profile of the bacteria in that particular sample of soil. From there it is a matter of letting a computer program, developed specifically for this by ESR, figure out whether any two samples match or not.
The beauty of the technique is that it is easy to show a jury whether any two samples are the same by comparing the graphs, and -- because the technique can be handled by forensic scientists familiar with molecular biology -- it could be done routinely and cheaply.
Crucial to the analysis is the scientists' belief that soil samples will be unique to a specific location. For instance, the soil under a forest will be different to soil under a cricket pitch, and even the soil in two neighboring backyards will differ depending on what is planted in the gardens.
"We are basically looking at exploiting that uniqueness," Horswell said.
The scientists also want to build a database of the DNA of bacteria in New Zealand soils, as that would give them the ability to say what the probability is of a fortuitous match with another soil [in the same way, the probability for a match in two samples of human DNA is calculated].
The database would also enable the scientists to suggest the provenance of an unknown soil. By putting an unknown soil's profile into the database, the scientists believe it will be possible to narrow down the type of environment the soil came from. So, for example, if the soil from a spade believed to be used in burying a victim was sandy, then police could search the beaches.
"We feel that we've proved the hypothesis that it works. Now we need to do some more validation of each bit of the method," Horswell said.
The work has attracted the attention of the people who run the facility known formally as the University of Tennessee Forensic Anthropology Facility and colloquially as the Body Farm, which studies what happens to human bodies after they die. Arpad Vass, a research and forensic scientist at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory, who is also attached to the body farm, is working with New Zealand doctoral studies student Rachel Parkinson.
With ESR, Parkinson is studying the bacteria that the body produces as it decomposes. By looking at soil, and the bugs from the body that have seeped into it, Parkinson hopes to create another tool to help pinpoint the time of death.
"We really don't have anything for the later stages of decomposition because the periods that they can estimate are quite wide," Parkinson said.
The ESR scientists suspect that certain bugs -- either from the decomposing body or those already in the soil -- will flourish at certain stages, similar to the way the arrival of insects on a dead body follows a certain pattern. A bacteria timeline could be another way of estimating the time of death.
Eventually the ESR team hopes this method might not even need soil, just the fluid from a decomposing body [and the bacteria therein].
"Hopefully we will understand, not necessarily what bacteria are involved with decomposition, but the changes that occur during decomposition," Parkinson said. "So we will be able to collect soil from under a body ... and compare it back to a database, perhaps of known times. Or we will be able to look for specific bacteria that we know come in at certain times as well."
Within two years, ESR plans to have developed a prototype soil-DNA analysis kit; Horswell hopes it will be ready for use in New Zealand courts in about five years' time.
"So," Horswell said, "if the person says I didn't murder her because I didn't go into that back garden, you can say, actually, I think you'll find you did."
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations