Last week, President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) stated that this year and next year would provide "windows of opportunity" for the resumption of cross-strait dialogue, adding that he was willing to sit down, shake hands, reconcile and engage in dialogue with Chinese President Hu Jintao (胡錦濤) in a third country.
As cross-strait relations are still fraught with problems, Chen's remark did not serve to ease tensions. Instead, it indicated that a storm is looming. At such a time, a national leader should not make statements that anesthetize his people and weaken their psychological preparedness against Chinese aggression.
What has caused cross-strait relations to remain strained is Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Lien Chan's (
During Lien's meeting with Hu in Beijing, Lien repeated his assurance that inclusion of referendums in the Constitution would not lead to Taiwan pursuing independence.
Since concluding his tour of China, Lien has yet to receive a positive reply from Chen. Lien has instead been accused of allying himself with the Chinese Communist Party to contain Taiwanese independence.
Chinese authorities in charge of Taiwan affairs now believe that Lien's "journey of peace" to China was only a ploy aimed at establishing the KMT's political line and allowing Lien to go down in history. The realization that his visit was not really about cross-strait detente is said to have "hurt China's feelings."
Thus, national security departments within the People's Liberation Army (PLA) have extensively studied the issue of referendums and concluded that the attempt to include these in the Constitution is the first step toward seeking de jure independence. On May 28 and 29, China's Taiwan experts convened in Beihai, Guangxi Province, in the hope of setting the tone for future cross-strait relations.
During the meeting, some proposed directly negotiating the sovereignty issue and the status of Taiwan with Taipei rather than the impractical suggestion that "all topics are open for discussion." Apparently, these people have been racking their brains to seek ways for both sides to make concessions and engage in dialogue.
Such a claim has yet to garner sufficient support within China. Most argue that Beijing should set a limit on concessions made to Taipei, and that China should not ignore the threat posed by the cause of Taiwanese independence.
This hardline approach prevailed at the meeting, but how to implement it was not finalized. The matter has been handed over to the national security divisions of the PLA for further study. If it is the PLA that has the final say in cross-strait matters, it is not hard to guess what direction affairs in the Taiwan Strait will take.
Despite this, there is still hope for peace. China is monitoring the various statements coming from the government, but since the Chen administration does not support its words with actions, the Chinese officials in charge of Taiwan affairs have been vexed over what is true and what is not. What they hope for most of all is for Chen to put his aspirations down on paper, listing the conditions on which negotiations can be resumed. Only then might all topics be open for discussion.
Therefore, to open the "window of opportunity" for peace across the Taiwan Strait, Chen not only has to make clear what he is prepared to do for the establishment of a "mechanism of mutual trust," he also has to ascertain whether the "doves" in the Chinese government are willing to accept his goodwill. Unfortunately, this "voice of peace" is not able to make itself heard over the voice of those calling for a "civil war" across the Strait. That is why we have the current crisis, and that is why US Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld felt it necessary at a conference in Singapore on the weekend to warn of expanding Chinese military activity.
Wang Kun-yi is an associate professor at the Graduate Institute of International Affairs and Strategic Studies at Tamkang University.
Translated by Daniel Cheng and Ian Bartholomew
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry