For years, children the world over have learned from Asterix in Britain, in which the plucky comic-book Gaul of ancient times and his buddy Obelix have adventures across the English Channel, that Britons break for a cup of hot water (they hadn't yet discovered tea) every afternoon and don't work weekends.
And the Brits' penchant for pauses proves, in the book, to be their downfall: They get invaded by Romans because they're too busy putting their feet up.
Now, the tables have turned. Instead of poking fun, some in France are wondering whether the country shouldn't be learning from its island neighbor to the north. They point to Britain's far lower unemployment, higher economic growth and perceived dynamism and wonder: Are we the ones taking life too slow?
Renewed interest in "the Anglo-Saxon model" springs from France's wider search for answers to its economic problems and fears that the forces of globalization -- a bit like the Romans in Asterix -- threaten to sweep away the beloved French way of life.
Politicians, parts of the French media and business executives note that France's unemployment rate -- at 10.2 percent, rising to 23.3 percent among under-25s -- is more than twice that of Britain. Some say that is because the British labor market is more flexible than France's -- and that perhaps there are lessons to be drawn.
Others wonder whether Britain isn't doing better because of its refusal to adopt the euro currency used by 12 European nations, including France.
There are figures to support that argument: Economic growth was an anemic 1.8 percent last year in the euro zone, with France faring a bit better with 2.3 percent, according to the Paris-based Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). British growth, in contrast, was 3.1 percent and, the OECD predicts, will be 2.4 percent this year -- twice the euro zone's expected 1.2 percent.
For the moment, radical reform does not appear on the agenda of the new French government put into place by President Jacques Chirac in response to France's stunning May 29 "no" to the proposed EU constitution.
The vote and the heated, divisive national debate that preceded it energized leftists, trade unions and anti-globalization activists who campaigned for a "no." They would likely be the first to take to the streets at the merest hint from the government that it was thinking of treading the British path of the past two decades, breaking the power of trade unions, freeing up labor markets and privatizing some public services like the rail network.
Even before the referendum, Chirac acknowledged that the British model was a nonstarter with most of the French, whose deep attachment to their system of state-funded public services and strong labor and social protections was a primary reason for their rejection of the EU treaty. An exit poll found that 40 percent of "no" voters regarded the constitution as too economically liberal, that it would open the door to unfettered -- read British-American-style -- capitalism.
"Great Britain considers that economic development is paramount," said Chirac in a TV interview four weeks before the vote. "The result is that they have half of our unemployment, but at a social cost that would not be accepted in France. I'm not casting judgment. It's a fact."
Chirac's new prime minister, Dominique de Villepin, was quick in his first week on the job to toe his boss' line. In a TV interview, Villepin described himself as a "pragmatist profoundly attached to the French model," although he also said "everything must be tried" in the fight against unemployment, which he has made his government's top priority.
But others are asking questions of the French system -- not least Villepin's No.2, Interior Minister Nicolas Sarkozy. Sarkozy, who is widely believed to have ambitions on the presidency at the next elections in 2007, says the best social model is one that provides jobs for all and "so is no longer ours."
In a report last November comparing the two countries' systems, a group of Britain-based French business leaders said that laying off workers is too hard in France, making companies reluctant to take new people on.
"Give us the freedom to hire and fire," they pleaded.
Noting that Britain's per capita GDP has overtaken France's, their report added: "Taking inspiration from the United Kingdom is not cheating, and recognizing that is already a victory."
The French media are also looking beyond the nation's borders for answers.
In a story headlined, "Recipes that work," the daily Le Parisien examined the British, Dutch and Danish systems.
British Prime Minister Tony Blair had created "very efficient structures" for helping the unemployed find work, the newspaper noted.
And last month, news magazine L'Express put the British premier on its cover with the title "Tony Blair -- why he succeeds." The six-page story started "He has made his country richer," and noted that while he won re-election, "France, Italy and Germany are stagnating, victims of doubt and a crisis of confidence in their leaders."
Such debate makes hairs stand up on the Left.
Asked in a radio interview about the Anglo-Saxon model, Socialist lawmaker and "no" campaigner Henri Emmanuelli was indignant.
"You speak about Great Britain without specifying that to earn a living, people there have to have two or three jobs," he said.
He added sarcastically: "Even better than that would be slavery with a bowl of rice as recompense. That way there would be no unemployment at all."
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under