The Chinese Nationalist Party's (KMT) chairmanship election could have been a watershed leading to change and party reform. Regardless of who wins, positive competition and media information would have given the public the impression that the party has changed during its eight years in opposition. It would have both improved the party's image and increased its chances in the year-end mayoral and county commissioner elections.
The reform that was supposed to be the result of the chairmanship election, however, has turned into a drawn-out failure. First, there was the central standing committee's signature drive, and then party members kneeling to implore Chairman Lien Chan (
Taiwan has been democratic for many years, but there are still KMT members that like to play old imperial games.
Will democratic competition within the party tear the KMT apart? Maybe, because such is the temporary pain of reform. Over the long term, however, it will be beneficial to the formation of a superior democratic culture. Look at American democracy, and the Democratic and Republican parties. In the party preliminaries held prior to the presidential election every four years, slander and personal attacks abound. When the results are out, however, the earlier vitriol is abandoned and each party unites.
Both of the KMT's previous two splits have taken place under a patriarchal system. If this chairmanship election abandons democratic procedure for patriarchal leadership, it will be tantamount to democratic regression and will alienate the public.
If Lien stays on to "consolidate the party leadership" as his supporters claim, the competition for the party's presidential candidacy will merely be postponed.
What's more, if Lien wants to stay on, why did he risk being called a communist sympathizer for undertaking his "peace tour" to China at such a sensitive moment, when Beijing had just passed its "Anti-Secession" Law? Turning it around, would stepping aside improve Lien's historical legacy? The answer is yes. Apart from being the first KMT chairman to voluntarily hand over power, he would have laid the foundations for party democracy.
Former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) is called "Mr Democracy," but while he gave Taiwan full-fledged democratic elections, he failed to establish democratic mechanisms within the KMT. Lien's legacy could be to establish a democratic procedure for the chairmanship election.
Since it was unclear if Lien would again run for election, his supporters may have been allowed to engage in their recent activities simply because of his sluggish character or an unwillingness to oppose them. But given the KMT's lack of a democratic culture, deeply rooted in past feudal evils, and the fact that his supporters already have prepared a signature document and the required NT$1 million deposit, Lien could still surprise everyone and register his candidacy before next Wednesday.
If he does, I don't think Ma will be too surprised. Ma -- who said on many occasions that he would not run for Taipei mayor -- will surely be able to make a reasonable excuse for Lien. If Lien runs for re-election, we will have to rely on Ma's determination to establish a democratic culture within the party and break the myth of "consolidated party leadership."
Jan Shou-jung is a former legislative assistant.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations