In any democratic country, launching a public policy has never been an easy job. The authorities need to move slowly, solicit stakeholders' input at every stage and pay careful attention to public interest, aiming at making their concerns about the prospective policy all the more remarkable.
The backing-off by financial regulators last week from considering a proposal for splitting the single stock-trading session into two -- one in the morning and the other in the afternoon -- was an example of not only how reckless financial regulators are in their approach, but also how there seem to be less and less debate over public policy these days.
The whole fiasco started with a poll conducted by the Taiwan Securities Association (
The proposal to extend trading hours was a simple matter of technical adjustment, but it deserved a good discussion over what impact it could have on local capital markets, on the process of stock delivery and on the ceiling of daily stock movements. However, brokerage workers' immediate opposition to the proposal and their threats to stage protests and mass rallies forced financial regulators to abandon their plan on Thursday, leaving no real and constructive room for public discussion.
The local bourse wasn't always restricted to a single trading session. In 1962 when the Taiwan Stock Exchange opened, it adopted a system of two stock-trading sessions on weekdays and only the morning session on Saturdays. It continued this system for almost two decades through 1984. In July 1984, the regulators decided to pursue a single-trading-session system between 9pm and noon daily, and extended the hours to 1:30am in 2001 after the nation began a new working-week system (Saturday off every other week).
Although local investors and securities companies said they are accustomed to four-and-a-half-hour sessions and rejected the change, if trading hours were adjustable in the past for various reasons, what's the reason now that they cannot be changed back? That's debate No. 1.
Secondly, financial regulators claimed that a longer session would generate more turnover. Are trading hours really a matter influencing stock turnover? That's debate No. 2.
Taiwan's stock market is known for being dominated by retail investors, who complained that extended trading hours would affect their living habits, as they might have to spend more time paying attention to stocks and this would result in less productivity in their own businesses. But if the government really meant to encourage more participation by institutional investors who are better equipped to make investment decisions for retail punters such as housewives and retired citizens, isn't it true that extended trading hours could be the only effective way to force retail investors into seeking the advice of institutional investors? This is debate No. 3.
Lastly, financial regulators said the purpose of extending trading hours was aimed at connecting with international stock markets and to compete with exchanges in countries such as Japan or Hong Kong, where there are two trading sessions daily. Shouldn't we ask whether the development of the local stock market is more relevant to our economy, the governance of listed companies and stock market regulations, than the simple issue of trading hours?
If the market is well developed, foreign investors would flood in even if investors are allowed to trade just one hour a day.
At the end of last month, Paraguayan Ambassador to Taiwan Marcial Bobadilla Guillen told a group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators that his president had decided to maintain diplomatic ties with Taiwan, despite pressure from the Chinese government and local businesses who would like to see a switch to Beijing. This followed the Paraguayan Senate earlier this year voting against a proposal to establish ties with China in exchange for medical supplies. This constituted a double rebuke of the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) diplomatic agenda in a six-month span from Taiwan’s only diplomatic ally in South America. Last year, Tuvalu rejected an
South China Sea exercises in July by two United States Navy nuclear-powered aircraft carriers reminds that Taiwan’s history since mid-1950, and as a free nation, is intertwined with that of the aircraft carrier. Eventually Taiwan will host aircraft carriers, either those built under its democratic government or those imposed on its territory by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and its People’s Liberation Army Navy (PLAN). By September 1944, a lack of sufficient carrier airpower and land-based airpower persuaded US Army and Navy leaders to forgo an invasion to wrest Taiwan from Japanese control, thereby sparing Taiwanese considerable wartime destruction. But two
As Taiwan is engulfed in worries about Chinese infiltration, news reports have revealed that power inverters made by China’s Huawei Technologies Co are used in the solar panels on the top of the Legislative Yuan’s Zhenjiang House (鎮江會館) on Zhenjiang Street in Taipei. However, what is even more worrying is that Taiwan’s new national electronic identification card (eID) has been subcontracted to the French security firm and eID maker Idemia, which has not only cooperated with the Chinese Public Security Bureau to manufacture eIDs in China, but also makes the new identification cards being issued in Hong Kong. There might be more
All lives eventually come to an end. Over the years, my friendship with former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) had its ups and downs. Lee’s passing was a heavy blow and has left me deeply saddened. We experienced a lot together and the memories have come flooding back. Lee was born several months earlier than me. During World War II, he was studying at Kyoto Imperial University, but halfway through his studies, he was forced to change his name and enter military service. I was studying at Tokyo Imperial University, but went into hiding to avoid military service, and I was later