China's "Anti-Secession" Law,has identified conditions that would compel Beijing to use force against Taiwan.
However, given the degree of importance attached to these conditions, they deserve to be better defined.
Whenever the boundary of a condition isn't delineated clearly, people choose to err on the conservative side. To use an analogy of driving a car, it's like yielding when you are unsure if you have the right of way. Perhaps that's how Beijing believes it can get something for nothing.
But the establishment of a "minimum fig leaf" could help.
Article 8 of the "law" states the clearest condition for the application of "non-peaceful" means. It states that if "secessionist forces should act under any name or by any means to cause the fact of Taiwan's secession from China, or that major incidents entailing Taiwan's secession from China should occur ... the state shall employ non-peaceful means and other necessary measures to protect China's sovereignty and territorial integrity."
This condition is saying that Taiwan hasn't fully "seceded," and whatever it has done so far or will do in the future does not qualify for Beijing's application of non-peaceful means unless full secession becomes a fact.
This is one of those instances where the most important message is in between the lines and what has not been revealed could count just as much. The salient point is that steps taken toward full secession would not elicit a non-peaceful response so long as the last step is not taken.
The room for Taiwan's continuing democratization without drawing military attacks from China could be substantial if a minimum condition for "full secession" -- as Beijing defines it -- could be determined.
It appears that Beijing can't afford a war in the foreseeable future. They have the 2008 Summer Olympics to worry about. After 2008, the US military will probably have substantially disengaged from Iraq and Japan's military will be on its way to a full build-up.
Japan will always weigh prohibitively on Beijing's war impulses; heavy damage will be inflicted on China's economy as a consequence of war with Taiwan, and this could have a domino effect on China's stability and threaten the Chinese Communist Party's grip on power. Therefore, Beijing will use any excuse to avoid going to war. That might actually be what prompted the enactment of the "law" in the first place. Reportedly, the "law" was intended to guard against the possibility that Beijing wouldn't go to war even if Taiwan formally declared independence.
With that in mind, one is justified to define the minimum condition for full secession to be a universally-accepted bare minimum, the realization of which would certainly make China "lose face" internationally -- namely, Taiwan's formal declaration of independence accompanied by a new title and a new flag. The absence of this condition constitutes the "minimum fig leaf."
As a consequence, the second condition of Article 8 which states: "possibilities for a peaceful reunification should be completely exhausted" becomes somewhat moot. The reason is that Beijing can always fall back on the excuse that "possibilities" exist as long as the "minimum fig leaf" is in place.
The last condition. which reads: "major incidents entailing Taiwan's secession from China should occur" is beyond the control of the Taiwanese people. Therefore, it should be ignored too.
The most severe test to the usefulness of the "minimum fig leaf" can be conducted by examining the likelihood of Beijing's use of force, in the event that a brand new constitution for Taiwan -- complete with a new definition of the national territory and a new national anthem -- were brought into being.
As an immediate reaction, Beijing might warn that Taiwan is getting ready to declare independence. But Beijing could be placated with repeated reminders that the "minimum fig leaf" has not been abandoned. Beijing would soon realize that a new constitution is but a necessary step for Taiwan's continuing democratization. Granted, it's a big step. But it would certainly be no more significant than the one undertaken by the Taiwanese people when they first elected their own government.
Taiwan has the right of way, and should just take it.
Huang Jei-hsuan
California
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
Ursula K. le Guin in The Ones Who Walked Away from Omelas proposed a thought experiment of a utopian city whose existence depended on one child held captive in a dungeon. When taken to extremes, Le Guin suggests, utilitarian logic violates some of our deepest moral intuitions. Even the greatest social goods — peace, harmony and prosperity — are not worth the sacrifice of an innocent person. Former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), since leaving office, has lived an odyssey that has brought him to lows like Le Guin’s dungeon. From late 2008 to 2015 he was imprisoned, much of this
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and