The Taiwanese government faces a real challenge. Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Lien Chan (連戰) has visited China in a trip that is historic because it ends decades of hostility between the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the KMT.
While some media outlets described Lien's visit as high-profile and icebreaking, Lien dubbed his trip as a "journey of peace," and his main concern was "to exchange views with the Chinese leaders on major issues concerning peace, economic, trade and cultural exchanges across the [Taiwan] Strait."
Among the major issues, Lien emphasized greater access for Taiwan's agricultural exports. Chinese officials responded by offering Taiwan various gifts, including a pair of pandas and proposals regarding a Closer Economic Partnership Arrangement (CEPA). The CEPA would lead to exemptions on import tax for Taiwanese produce, an arrangement that Chinese analysts view as a gesture of goodwill.
However, Taiwanese officials are very skeptical about the ramifications of the opposition leaders' visits to China, and are especially suspicious of the agricultural and transportation proposals offered. There is genuine concern over this matter, and -- if only for domestic political reasons -- it is fundamentally dangerous for the government not to adopt an extremely cautious approach.
The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) gains its strongest support from central and southern Taiwan. Most analysts agree that southerners have the strongest convictions and have been the most faithful group in supporting the political aspirations of President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁). It is fair to say that the large numbers of supporters in the rural south have firmly anchored the DPP's electoral position. Some say that these people, mostly native Hoklo (also known as Taiwanese) and Hakka farmers, are the crucial reason Chen was re-elected president last year.
Usually, southerners "resent the Mainlanders" and care even less about escalating tensions between Taiwan and China. The DPP, when pursuing its agenda, has always been confident of keeping the southerners' unconditional support. However, this situation is starting to change, and appears very unpredictable.
Ever since Taiwan joined the WTO, farmers have come under considerable pressure. As Taiwan fulfills its WTO commitments to open its markets and eliminate protectionist trade measures, farmers are becoming more and more desperate as they struggle to make a living. Prices of foreign goods are so low that farmers often find it impossible to compete with them and maintain their current income.
When China offered its agricultural and transportation deals, the farmers were placed in an invidious position, and they may take up China's offer.
From a realist's perspective, there is a danger to Taiwan's national interest if economic ties with China become more intimate.
The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) recently warned that China's offer of greater agricultural access to the Chinese market was only part of Beijing's "united front" strategy. The MAC believes that Taiwanese agriculture could get "backed into a corner by China."
Once the farmers start to depend on China's vast market, they will be influenced by Beijing's policy shifts. The original hope of engaging with China may soon become a nightmare of national interests coming under threat.
When your most important market tells you to jump off a cliff, you may have very little power to resist.
China has directed the founder of the Chi Mei Group, known as a long-time friend of the DPP, to make a public announcement supporting the "one China" policy. There is no reason why China will not repeat this tactic if the proposed changes sweep Taiwanese farmers off their feet.
Some academics in Taiwan are calling for a measured response on this issue, because China only accounts for 8 percent of the nation's total agricultural exports. They are concerned that a Chinese "tariff-free policy" on Taiwanese produce might make the economy more dependent on the Chinese market.
If the "tariff-free policy" is indeed designed to win the hearts of the "hardline" southerners, the government must react carefully. In the south, the more radical pro-independence party, the Taiwan Solidarity Union, is already making important gains at the DPP's expense because of Chen's constrained response to developments. In other words, Chen is not seen as supporting independence actively enough.
China has therefore created an agricultural "Catch 22." The DPP risks alienating its core supporters if it rejects the export offers. But that same core group strongly supports independence -- which may be threatened by accepting increased ties with China.
The farmers have a difficult choice to make, but only after the government has chosen the direction it wishes to take. Exports or independence? The DPP must guess which of two things will triumph: a farmer's bank account or his passport.
Lai Ling-ju is a graduate student in the department of diplomacy at National Chengchi University. William Vocke is a visiting professor at National Chengchi University and a former president of the World Affairs Council of America.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations