British Prime Minister Tony Blair has been shocked by the personal hostility shown towards him during the election campaign and is doubtful that he can win back the trust of the British people, some of his closest political colleagues admit.
They believe his mood, which will in part be affected by the size of Labour's majority, will add to the sense that power is leaving the prime minister and shifting toward Chancellor of the Exchequer Gordon Brown. One solace is that his relationship with Brown is now at its best for many years.
Earlier this year, Blair spoke of his difficult relationship with the British public but expressed optimism that it could be mended.
After a month in which he has been harangued about Iraq on the street, in TV studios and countless interviews, as well as branded a liar, not just by the leader of the opposition, but also by ordinary members of the public, those close to him said the criticism had struck home.
Some say he has recognized that he is unlikely to recover popularity.
"For a man who likes to be liked, this is difficult," said one friend. "It has been a very tough campaign. The backdrop of attacks from the families of servicemen was grim."
Plans during the election campaign to make the moral case for "New Labour," or to set out a clear vision of a third term in the public services, became muffled by the need to drive so hard on the economy.
Blair had also planned to make a "visionary" foreign policy speech during the campaign setting out the case for his interventionist policy on weapons of mass destruction, international interventionism and the government's G8 agenda. But the speech was shelved at the insistence of his campaign team.
He was told, and has himself now admitted, that he is not able to persuade anyone one way or the other about his Iraq venture. By the end of the campaign, his passionate defense of the invasion had gone, and he was reduced to saying he had made an honest decision that he believed to be right at the time.
His colleagues say he has been personally hurt that so many people believe he took the country to war on a lie, pointing out that four separate inquiries had found no clear evidence of him deliberately misleading the public.
Blair's allies say his current mood -- not dissimilar to the state of mind that nearly prompted his resignation a year ago -- is unlikely to lift quickly.
Disheartened though he may be, the prime minister will have a raft of pressing issues facing him. The most pressing will be the reshuffle of his government but the more important ones will be those barely mentioned in the election campaign: pensions, nuclear power, council tax (local property taxes), defense and Europe.
Blair will have to consider these against a background of media speculation about when he will stand down. One minister predicted he would stay at Downing Street for a "respectable" period, about two years and maybe even three, before handing over.
Blair said on Wednesday that he wanted a third term mainly to make progress on social justice. He told reporters: "What moves me is very simple. We have made tremendous progress but there are still far too many children that do not get the right breaks, still far too many people that do not get the healthcare they need, far too many hard-working families that do not get support they depend on."
A Cabinet reshuffle will test the extent of the rapprochement between Blair and Brown, as well as the degree to which the prime minister has lost his will to impose his reformist vision upon the government. The evidence of both those factors will be in how many of those close to Brown gain promotion.
A potential source of tension between Blair and Brown will be on paying for the social justice program. Blair signalled during the election that he regarded the sharp increase in public spending as a one-off.
The question is whether Brown will attempt to edge up public spending to pay for improvements in health and meet the target of halving child poverty by 2010.
Issues requiring prompt attention include identity cards, implementation of a smoking ban in public places and the introduction of a points system on asylum.
Labour was able to avoid many contentious issues during the campaign by pointing out that reviews were under way. One of these -- on council tax -- is due for publication in December. Another, on pensions, chaired by Adair Turner, is scheduled for autumn next year.
On the latter, the government will face awkward choices: raise the pension age, increase national insurance (though Blair promised not to) or introduce compulsory savings. But the government might opt to push a decision back. Ed Balls, one of Brown's closest confidants, said any change to pensions would not come in for "many, many years."
Another issue ducked during the campaign was that of investment in a new generation of nuclear reactors to replace Britain's ageing stock. A white paper on nuclear energy is scheduled for publication during the third term.
On the foreign policy front, apart from contributing to the effort to secure stability in Iraq and an orderly withdrawal of British troops, the two key dates in the calendar are the G8 at Gleneagles, Scotland, in July, with Britain holding the presidency, and Britain taking over the presidency of the European Union, also in July.
Blair and Brown have put alleviation of African poverty and climate change top of the G8 agenda. Britain already has the support of other Europeans and Canada for its debt relief proposals but the US is sceptical, claiming it does not want a system that will reward corrupt leaders.
As a person raised in a family that revered the teachings of Confucius (孔子) and Mencius (孟子), I believe that both sages would agree with Hong Kong students that people-based politics is the only legitimate way to govern China, including Hong Kong. More than two millennia ago, Confucius insisted that a leader’s first loyalty is to his people — they are water to the leader’s ship. Confucius said that the water could let the ship float only if it sailed in accordance with the will of the water. If the ship sailed against the will of the water, the ship would sink. Two
South China Sea exercises in July by two United States Navy nuclear-powered aircraft carriers reminds that Taiwan’s history since mid-1950, and as a free nation, is intertwined with that of the aircraft carrier. Eventually Taiwan will host aircraft carriers, either those built under its democratic government or those imposed on its territory by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and its People’s Liberation Army Navy (PLAN). By September 1944, a lack of sufficient carrier airpower and land-based airpower persuaded US Army and Navy leaders to forgo an invasion to wrest Taiwan from Japanese control, thereby sparing Taiwanese considerable wartime destruction. But two
This year, India and Taiwan can look back on 25 years of so-called unofficial ties. This provides an occasion to ponder over how they can deepen collaboration and strengthen their relations. This reflection must be free from excitement and agitation caused by the ongoing China-US great power jostling as well as China’s aggressive actions against many of its neighbors, including India. It must be based on long-term trends in bilateral engagement. To begin with, India and Taiwan, thus far, have had relations constituted by various activities, but what needs to be thought about now is whether they can transform their ties
The US Navy’s aircraft carrier battle groups are the most dramatic symbol of Washington’s military and geopolitical power. They were critical to winning World War II in the Pacific and have since been deployed in the Indo-Pacific region to communicate resolve against potential adversaries of the US. The presence or absence of the US Seventh Fleet — the configuration of US Navy ships and aircraft in the Indo-Pacific region built around the carriers — generally determines whether war or peace prevails in the region. In the immediate post-war period, Washington’s strategic planners in the administration of then-US president Harry Truman shockingly