As a counterattack against Beijing's enactment of the "Anti-Secession" Law targeting Taiwan, the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) made a decision on April 10 to temporarily ban China's state-run Xinhua News Agency and People's Daily newspaper from stationing correspondents in Taiwan. Once the decision was announced, it immediately caused polarized reactions in Taiwan's public. But, is it reasonable to cut down cross-strait media exchanges?
Those who support the MAC's decision tend to view this issue from a national security perspective. They believe the two Chinese media outlets have long carried out political propaganda for the Chinese government and have issued misleading reports about Taiwan's affairs.
As a result, rather than allowing the Chinese media to continually besmirch Taiwan, they prefer that the government has taken the initiative to root out these media culprits. They think that only in this way can cross-strait exchanges be carried out on a basis of equality.
Those who oppose the MAC's move tend to view this issue from the perspective of preserving press freedom. They believe that barring Chinese journalists from Taiwan not only damages Taiwan's image of democracy and liberty, it doesn't help to resolve the cross-strait deadlock.
This issue must be looked at in two ways. The first is to ask whether allowing Chinese journalists to be stationed in Taiwan achieves the goal of creating an environment of balanced and diverse cross-strait reporting.
But since these journalists first came to Taiwan, policymakers have known that this was simply a move in the government's cross-strait strategy, and had nothing to do with helping the people of China learn more about Taiwan.
Under China's political system, news agencies are no more than government mouthpieces and their stories must reflect the government's standards and judgement. The decision to allow Chinese media workers into Taiwan was intended as a goodwill gesture for a hoped-for reciprocation in Beijing's Taiwan policy.
It is obvious that Taiwan did not receive the expected response from China; and therefore, the government officials believe that terminating the policy is natural and right.
The second approach is to take an ideological perspective. Since the Democratic Progressive Party came to power in 2000, the guidelines for maintaining diplomatic ties have focused on upholding the nation as an independent political entity.
As a result, the nation's diplomatic and cross-strait policies gradually lost flexibility and pragmatism. Toeing the right political line is what matters now in decision-making.
Although the government's drive to push for localization in Taiwan has proved fruitful, it has brought it back into a state of confrontation with China. President Chen Shui-bian's (
It is hardly surprising that Chen is tightening the policy on cross-strait exchanges to keep the initiative and to emphasize Taiwan's separate existence. While Taiwan makes small sacrifices of its cross-strait bargaining counters as a way of keeping the initiative, it reveals its inability to come up with a new framework to really resolve the cross-strait stalemate.
Taiwan, when jostling for power, actually has many advantages over China. How to make good use of all these resources and turn the tables on China is the most urgent task regarding the formulation of cross-strait policy.
Chen Mu-min is an assistant professor of Political Science at the National Changhua University of Education.
TRANSLATED BY YA-TI LIN AND DANIEL CHENG
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
Ursula K. le Guin in The Ones Who Walked Away from Omelas proposed a thought experiment of a utopian city whose existence depended on one child held captive in a dungeon. When taken to extremes, Le Guin suggests, utilitarian logic violates some of our deepest moral intuitions. Even the greatest social goods — peace, harmony and prosperity — are not worth the sacrifice of an innocent person. Former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), since leaving office, has lived an odyssey that has brought him to lows like Le Guin’s dungeon. From late 2008 to 2015 he was imprisoned, much of this
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and