March is a month of sun and blossoming of spring. Who would have expected that this March would be filled with problems that will be difficult to mend in the short term?
There are many reasons for this, but, in short, it stems from a lack of tolerance; everyone is thinking of their own interests and will accept no divergent opinions. Taiwan's domestic infighting has stifled the political climate and divisions are seen everywhere. Without domestic harmony, there can be neither cross-strait reconciliation nor friendly international relations.
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Vice Chairman Chiang Pin-kun's (江丙坤) visit to China has led to intense conflict between the government and opposition, and some say that the KMT is joining the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) in preventing Taiwan's development toward statehood. The fact that the KMT delegation did not meet with government officials before the visit should be subjected to public debate, but describing the visit as aiming to prevent Taiwan's development toward statehood is going too far.
The KMT is but an opposition party. It has no governmental status and thus cannot represent the nation in bilateral talks or when signing agreements with China. The 10-point agreement between the KMT and the CCP is not legally binding. Should the government ignore it, it becomes but the private action of a political party, so where does it get the power to "prevent Taiwan's development toward statehood?"
I believe that political parties should consider the issues from a public viewpoint, and not try to win advantages based on their own interests. The public sees through such actions, which are the beginning of the end for a political party. Parties clearly have to rely on their own efforts to win the public's trust.
Some believe that the timing of Chiang's visit has helped China relieve international pressure created by the "Anti-Secession" Law. I think the timing -- 15 days after the passage of the Anti-Secession Law and three days after the March 26 protests against that law -- had an impact on the March 26 demonstration, but it is debatable whether it had any impact on international sentiment.
The EU's delayed lifting of the arms embargo on China following the passage of the Anti-Secession Law is but a temporary diplomatic restriction. If the temptations and pressures of China's market cannot be resisted, the embargo will not continue for long. China is indeed a factory to the world, and it will inevitably continue to be so.
Placing our hopes in the international community is therefore less efficient than working for domestic unity. I hope that everyone will understand the urgency of pacifying the domestic situation before resisting foreign aggression.
The focus should now be placed on the question of whether the 10-point agreement that Chiang brought back will become a political tool and whether China will use KMT Chairman Lien Chan (連戰) and People First Party Chairman James Soong (宋楚瑜) to attack President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁). Ignoring Chiang's 10-point agreement will also turn the 10-point consensus between Chen and Soong into an empty slogan.
The KMT should help the government and both parties should assess the importance and urgency of the two agreements before choosing the topics on which to cooperate -- based on the public's viewpoint. They must then take quick action to avoid setting off domestic struggles, being abandoned by the public and coming under China's thumb, thus gaining nothing. That is the worst that could happen. Domestic reconciliation is the only way out of the cross-strait problem.
Li Hua-chiu is a part-time researcher with the National Policy Foundation.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry