When New Yorker reporter Jeffrey Goldberg asked US Democratic Senator John Kerry whether the Democrats had a credibility problem on defense controversies, the party's titular leader replied without equivocation, "Look, the answer is, we have to do an unbranding."
As Kerry saw it, the political problem had to do with salesmanship: "We have to brand more effectively. It's marketing."
An editor on the linguistic qui vive titled Goldberg's article about the Democrats' need to shuck off the appearance of weakness "The Unbranding."
The hot word in the field of sales -- indeed, pervading the world of perfect pitching -- is brand.
"The King Is Dead, Long Live His Brand" is the Times headline above an article about the way "Michael Jordan is being mortalized so his sneakers can stay in the game." That's because "building a brand on the back of a legend works only until that back breaks."
infamy
The noun blazed on the scene a thousand years ago as a burning stick, and the meaning soon transferred to the mark left on the skin of a horse or a criminal by such a stick, or branding iron. That mark became the sign of infamy: Richard Hooker wrote in 1597 of an age marked "with the brand of error and superstition," and later, a firebrand became the symbol of an inflammatory rabble-rouser.
The burned-in mark in the 19th century began to signify ownership not just of an animal but also of liquids in wooden casks, like wine or ale. The brand-mark became a "trademark," and in the 20th century the designated item so labeled became a brand. In 1929, Fleischmann's Yeast absorbed the coffee maker Chase & Sanborn and other companies to form Standard Brands (now a part of Kraft), in the hope that brand names would produce brand loyalty. A generation later, David Ogilvy, the advertising executive, was dubbed by the author Martin Mayer in 1958 as an "apostle of the `brand image'" who sought to persuade the consumer, "that brand A, technically identical with brand B, is somehow a better product."
Within two years, the novelist Kingsley Amis extended brand image from a product to a genre: "mad scientists attended by scantily clad daughters" constitute "the main brand-image of science fiction."
As the millennium ended, consumers wanted to become closely associated with famous names. Alex Frankel, author of Wordcraft, a book about the origins of brand names, says, "We used to buy a well-crafted pair of shoes; now we buy a pair of Nikes because we like what they're associated with -- Michael Jordan and `Just Do It.'"
atmosphere
In the same way, Evan Morris, author of From Altoids to Zima, points to the creation of a product-line atmosphere: "Calvin Klein and Ralph Lauren both strike me as innovators in the reassertion of the personal name as a brand with a well-known `general character' that gives consumers some idea of what tone their product, be it dress shirts, luggage or perfume, is likely to project (hyper-WASP, in both cases)."
At first, most of us attributed that parading of labels to snob appeal, or derogated it as a need by vacuous, lemminglike buyers to find a spurious identity in some highfalutin' or jazzy product line. But an alternative, libertarian view of the branding phenomenon was soon presented.
"It's a new brand world," wrote Tom Peters in the magazine Fast Company in 1997, playing on the compound adjective "brand-new." In an article titled "The Brand Called You," Peters argued that "the main chance is becoming a free agent in an economy of free agents ... looking to establish your own microequivalent of the Nike swoosh. Everyone has a chance to be a brand worthy of remark."
Well before the blogosphere became a media power, Peters held that "the Web makes the case for branding more directly than any packaged good or consumer product ever could ... So how do you know which sites are worth visiting? The answer: branding. The sites you go back to are the sites you trust ... The brand is a promise of the value you'll receive."
His article helped project a new sense of the word into common usage, as he suggested ways for individuals to self-brand by focusing on the values (of imagination or budgetary dependability, of creative talent or personal charm) that make an individual's brand unique.
We now have a Brandweek magazine, and a Web site aimed at what used to be called "Madison Avenue" named Brand Republic. Basketball teams, rock bands and celebrities rise and fall as brands. Business Week headlines a story about Yahoo's attempt to establish itself in foreign markets with "Exporting an Uber-Brand."
In a world where the words new and fresh are relentlessly repeated on every product label, the name of the sales technique is getting old and stale. Where is the ad-Ubermensch, the creative Ogilvy, who will put forward a new moniker for the name of the atmospheric marketing game? The time has come, as John Kerry puts it, to unbrand the word brand.
enthusiasm
The typography forced on us by some brand names bothers me. Yahoo! -- its name taken from Jonathan Swift's 1726 race of brutes -- inveigles anyone who writes about the company to express the enthusiasm required by the built-in exclamation point.
Why should we meekly go along with that advertising stunt? Henceforth, in protest, I will refer to that "little search engine that could" with different punctuation: Yahoo?
BlackBerry, appropriating the name of the fruit of a bramble bush, sports what is called "internal capitalization" to make the brand name distinctive. That's the next worst thing in corporate nomenclature, stemming like kudzu from the 1951 TelePrompTer. Entranced by the symmetry of two five-letter groups beginning with b, the corporate namers capitalized both, turning a proper noun improper, at least in my book.
What reason do I have to resist this sly typographic mind-manipulation? As Shakespeare put it in Henry IV, Part I: "If reasons were as plenty as Black-berries, I would give no man a reason upon compulsion" (the Bard wrote the word as "Black-berries," with initial cap and hyphen. Four centuries ago, that was OK).
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) trip to China provides a pertinent reminder of why Taiwanese protested so vociferously against attempts to force through the cross-strait service trade agreement in 2014 and why, since Ma’s presidential election win in 2012, they have not voted in another Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate. While the nation narrowly avoided tragedy — the treaty would have put Taiwan on the path toward the demobilization of its democracy, which Courtney Donovan Smith wrote about in the Taipei Times in “With the Sunflower movement Taiwan dodged a bullet” — Ma’s political swansong in China, which included fawning dithyrambs