I take issue with the assertion in your editorial ("TSU's shrine visit was honorable,"April 6, page 8) that "any country in the world, particularly China, has no right whatsoever to criticize the TSU's actions."
Of course the Taiwanese should be able to honor their war dead. However, it is absolutely not necessary to go to a controversial shrine used by the extreme Japanese nationalists as a rallying place in order to honor Taiwan's fallen World War II soldiers. While such a visit may accomplish its likely intended goal of angering people in China, it discounts the strong feelings of other Asian victims of Japanese militarism about such visits. It also ignores the strong feelings of most Americans about war criminals enshrined at the Yasukuni Shrine. It is a place, after all, where fanatical Japanese revisionists display paintings and sell postcards showing American soldiers being decapitated by gleeful sword-wielding Japanese.
While the TSU may have "succeeded" in annoying Beijing, a pilgrimage to Yasukuni Shrine simply does too much collateral damage to Taiwan's closest friends. These Asian neighbors who suffered under the Japanese during World War II are a strong economic and moral force for the prevention and alleviation of needless cross-straits tensions, while someday the Americans may be called upon to fight and die to protect Taiwan.
Home is where the heart is, and the best way to honor the fallen Taiwanese soldiers of World War II is to do so at their home, in Taiwan. These Taiwanese died tragically on behalf of a foreign nation, but at least let their spirits be honored in ways familiar to their true homeland. I do hope that a local memorial worthy of their sacrifice can someday be built so that this sort of insensitivity to Taiwan's best allies is not repeated.
Burger King Taiwan on Wednesday last week posted an update on Facebook advertising a new “Wuhan pneumonia” (武漢肺炎) home delivery meal, catering to customers hankering for a Whopper, but who wished to avoid visiting one of its outlets. “Wuhan pneumonia” is the term commonly used in Taiwan to describe COVID-19. Beijing has been waging an extensive propaganda campaign against the use of the words “Wuhan” or “China” in reference to the novel coronavirus, calling it racist and discriminatory. Meanwhile, Chinese officials have claimed that the coronavirus might have originated in the US. The intention is obvious: to distract attention from the Chinese Communist
Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) Air Force Shaanxi KJ-500 airborne early-warning aircraft and Shenyang J-11 fighters on March 16 conducted a nighttime exercise in the waters southwest of Taiwan and, in doing so, came close to the nation’s air defense identification zone. Three days later, the PLA Navy’s fleet for Gulf of Aden escort mission sailed north in the Pacific off Taiwan’s east coast via the Miyako Strait on its way home. Meanwhile, the US carried out freedom of navigation operations in the South China Sea and assembled the USS Theodore Roosevelt carrier strike group with the Expeditionary Strike Group to conduct
Italy, Spain, France, the UK and the US are all depending on social distancing to fight COVID-19 and have fallen into terrible situations, with mounting positive cases and many deaths. Social distancing might flatten the curve, so that the peak is not so high that hospitals are overwhelmed with patients, the problem is that the pandemic could extend further into the future, hurt the economy more and become unbearable for society. Taiwan, South Korea, Japan and Singapore have controlled the spread of COVID-19, and the main reason is that most Asians wear masks. It can be illustrated as follows: If someone contracts the
Having returned to the UK late last year and with a Taiwanese spouse remaining in Taiwan, I have been afforded the chance to compare and contrast the UK and Taiwanese governments’ responses to the COVID-19 crisis. My early conclusions are that Taiwan benefits from a rational, competent government, which quickly recognizes, adapts to and confronts large-scale disasters. It is led by a government that does more than just talk of respecting democracy and human rights, one that is scrutinized and responds to criticism, one that is concerned about public opinion, and one that is used to dealing with emergencies on