Most foreigners, especially those from North America, are sure to be familiar with the TV sitcom Seinfeld. Many will remember an episode where one of the central characters, George, has an epiphany explaining his failures in life. He realizes his judgement and intuition are profoundly flawed, a disposition which leads him to make the incorrect choice at every possible juncture in life. After some thought on the matter, he concludes that if every decision he made was incorrect, then the opposite decision could not help but be the correct one.
Thereafter he chooses counter to his initial judgement, which grants him success for the remainder of the episode.
I think the people of China should look into getting that episode translated into Chinese and sent to the leaders in Beijing. In much the same way that "opposite George" was conceived, a careful examination by the Communist Party could produce an "opposite China" scenario.
Here are some examples Beijing could follow:
First, when China says: "Hey, let's not bother about mine safety regulations -- it's no big deal." Wrong! Do the opposite and you won't lose face every seven weeks on CNN and the BBC in being highlighted for mining disasters -- not to mention saving a few lives.
Second, when China says: "Hey, why don't we pass legislation authorizing war just before we are about to get high-tech weaponry from Europe?" Wrong again. Do the opposite and wait until after you are cleared to receive the weapons and then pass the bill.
Third, when China says: "Hey, why don't we do everything in our power to curtail democracy in Hong Kong?" Strike three, friends! Do the opposite and you will convey legitimacy when peddling the virtues of the "one country, two systems" model, placating the skeptics in Taiwan.
Fourth, when China says, "Hey, why don't we muzzle all dissent in our party during policymaking?" Wrong again! Do the opposite and you wouldn't have to play the opposite game.
Bryan Ferguson
Canada
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.