On March 14, 2005, China promulgated an "Anti-Secession" Law with a vote of 2,896 to zero at its National People's Congress. The Anti-Secession Law authorizes China to "employ and execute non-peaceful means" against Taiwan when the Chinese president deems necessary to bring Taiwan into their authoritarian fold.
The intended application of this law is clearly targeted at not only Taiwan, but the US.
The motivation and contents are nothing but barbaric, malicious, and peace-threatening. It is a revival of historical Chinese imperialism.
We could handle this situation in various ways. We could leave it alone. After all, it is a domestic Chinese law. The People's Republic of China has never ruled Taiwan in history. Nor does this law have any jurisdiction over Taiwan.
Unfortunately, this do-nothing approach may encourage China to continually bully Taiwan and misbehave on the world stage. It could lead to increased instability and military conflict in the western Pacific.
We should not underestimate China's propensity toward brutal aggression. China invaded and occupied Tibet in 1959 and killed more than one million Tibetans. China attacked India in October 1962 and held a hostile relationship with India for nearly two decades. China wants its people to forget about its invasion of Vietnam in February 1979 by erasing it from their official history.
But the Taiwanese should not forget. The deployment of more than 700 Chinese missiles aimed at Taiwan is a persistent threat to peace.
It appears that China was a peace-loving country when it was weak, and an arrogant and offensive one when it was strong.
But this new law could backfire. The Bush administration and Congress have expressed a heightened concern.
And the US has apparently imposed pressure on the EU, which is expected to delay its plan to lift the embargo of selling advanced weapon systems to China -- at least until next year.
Ultimately, a more pragmatic and peaceful approach is for the international community to re-evaluate the ever-popular "one-China" policy.
It is unrealistic and nightmarish, but most of all the "one-China" policy is detrimental to the Taiwanese people's fundamental right to self-determination, which has been trampled by various imperial powers since the early seventeenth century.
The international community should help foster negotiations between China and Taiwan so that peace across the Taiwan Strait can be ensured and further development advanced.
Donald Shih
St. Louis, Missouri
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry