The Greek historian Herodotus, in The Histories, wrote of a curious Scythian custom. Whenever a Scythian king fell ill, he would send for three soothsayers, who would use their powers to name an individual as the cause of the illness. The belief was that the king could only become ill if someone had sworn an oath in the king's name, and then broken it.
Thus named, the guilty party was then arrested and brought before the king, whereupon he could choose to admit or deny the crime. If he denied it, the king would send for six more soothsayers, and if they declared that the man was innocent, the king would send for six more soothsayers -- and so on, until finally six soothsayers could be found who agreed with the original three. The "oath-breaker" was then beheaded summarily.
While such a method of establishing guilt seems quaint by modern standards, the pan-blue camp has decided that it is a perfectly reasonable means of legal inquiry, and have employed a similar method to uncover the "truth" behind the shooting of President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) and Vice President Annette Lu (呂秀蓮) on March 19 last year. How else can one explain the ongoing farce that comprises the pan-blues' effort to undermine the legitimacy of last year's presidential election?
The pan-blues watched sullenly as both of their lawsuits challenging the election results were tossed out by the courts. They stood by, unfazed, as the independent investigator they had invited, forensic scientist Henry Lee (
They rammed a 319 shooting statute through the legislature -- which they controlled -- that established an extra-legal partisan task force, giving it the grandiose title "March 19 Shooting Truth Investigation Special Committee."
Next, they ignored the Council of Grand Justices' ruling that parts of the special 319 committee statute were unconstitutional. Then they watched as this same "non-partisan" committee -- composed of pan-blue officials -- issued a report uncovering the "truth" of the shooting: It was staged. Well, of course it was. That's what Taipei taxi drivers have been saying all along.
In its defense, one must point out that the committee, although it ignored the normal channels of investigation and spurned the sparse evidence it had access to, did collect a vast body of data to prove its surprising theory.
The facts the committee was able to muster amounted to this: The shooting was, well, mysterious. Therefore, it must be part of a vast conspiracy stretching to the highest levels of government.
Meanwhile, an actual suspect has been identified by police after a lengthy, meticulous and unglamorous investigation (CSI: Tainan isn't in the offing just yet). And he has turned out to be an "unhinged fruitcake" trying to "make an amateurish attempt to kill a prominent and controversial political figure," as some genius predicted in April of last year.
So what has been the pan-blue response? To try to establish another "319 Shooting Truth Investigation Special Committee."
Find six new soothsayers. They'll get it right eventually.
It is a wonderful world that the pan-blues live in. It is the world of P.T. Barnum, Joseph Goebbels and every spin doctor that has ever held a government post. It is not, however, the real world.
Still, there was a downside to Scythian legal practices, which the pan-blues ought to investigate further. Sometimes, after every prophet in Scythia had been consulted, no one could be found who agreed with the first three soothsayers that the individual identified was guilty of breaking an oath.
So the three mistaken soothsayers were beheaded as criminals.
Summarily.
Mac William Bishop is an editor at the Taipei Times.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry