US President George W. Bush's decision to appoint John Bolton as ambassador to the UN, while controversial, is meant to send a clear signal to the international body that it is time for reform.
Bolton, a long time critic of the UN and currently the State Department's top diplomat for weapons nonproliferation, has been outspoken in blasting the organization for being ineffective and not conducive to US interests.
"There is nobody in the [Bush] administration that takes the issue of United Nations reform more seriously than John Bolton and you can be sure he will not shy away from speaking his mind," said Brett Schaefer, a diplomatic analyst at the Heritage Foundation, a conservative Washington think tank.
Bush's selection surprised officials at the UN and in Europe at a time when he is trying to rehabilitate trans-Atlantic alliances badly damaged during his first four years in office over the Iraq War. It reinforces the perception that Bush is a unilateralist unconcerned with the views of the US' closest friends.
Bolton is known for speaking his mind and is strongly supported by Vice President Dick Cheney, who lobbied for his position in the State Department over the objections of the more moderate and then-secretary of state Colin Powell.
US conservatives, especially within Congress, have been pushing for change at the UN, and for years blocked the payment of US dues until after the Sept. 11 attacks.
Bolton has long shared their view, emphasizing in 1994 the importance of the US in leading the world, rather than the UN that can rarely agree on a single policy, leaving it incapable of acting decisively.
"There is no such thing as the UN," he said, according to the Washington Post. "There is an international community that occasionally can be led by the only real power in the world, and that is the United States, when it suits our interest and we can get others to go along."
His appointment, which must be approved by the Senate, has raised objections at home. Opposition Democrats have vowed to fight the nomination in the Senate and some Republicans have expressed reservations. Forty-three Democrats voted against his posting as undersecretary at the State Department four years ago. Six voted, however, crossed party lines and voted for him.
Democratic Senator Joseph Biden, the ranking minority leader on the chamber's Foreign Relations Committee, said he was puzzled by Bush's choice.
"In light of the president's recent efforts to reach out to allies and the international community, I'm surprised at the choice of John Bolton to be our UN representa- tive," Biden said in a statement.
Senator John Kerry, who was narrowly defeated by Bush in last year's election, struck a harsher tone, saying Bolton carries "baggage we cannot afford."
"I recognize John Bolton's long service to our country, but this is just about the most inexplicable appointment the president could make to represent the United States to the world community," Kerry said.
But conservatives argue there could be tremendous benefits for the US and UN with Bolton's presence in New York.
The recent scandal over the mismanagement of the Iraqi oil-for-food program may ease his acceptance in the diplomatic ranks.
"The price that the scandal has had on the United Nations has created a more reform-minded atmosphere in the organization and may make it more receptive to to what Bolton is trying to do," Schaefer said.
By naming Bolton, Schaefer said Bush is sending the same message to congressional conservatives as he is to the UN: that he is serious about reform. Reform advocates in Congress have been sceptical about US efforts to change the UN, and Bolton will bring a higher level of credibility when he's addressing the issue on Capitol Hill because of his long record of pushing for reform, Schaefer said.
He also said that just because Washington wants changes at the UN doesn't mean it opposes the organization or that it is unilateralist "as a first recourse."
"Conservatives want to reform the United Nations ... but not throw the baby out with the bathwater," he said.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry