Who remembers the AIDS and drugs panics of the mid-1990s? We would guess that even those who were interested in drugs and health policy at the time will only have a vague recollection of fears that the new killer HIV virus would be spread by drug injectors sharing needles, then passed on to the rest of society through sexual contact.
At the time, doomsday scenarios of the rampant spread of drug-related HIV infection were fuelled by epidemics in Scotland, Thailand and the US, and panic solutions such as island camps for drug injectors were discussed. The national epidemic never happened. HIV rates among drug injectors in the UK have stayed below 1 percent since the early 1980s, and transmission from injectors to sexual partners has never been a significant factor in the disease's development.
How this public health disaster has been averted has received little attention: In the UK, infection rates have remained low because the government was among the first in the world to introduce public health measures. Targeted education campaigns, the provision of clean syringes and easy access to drug treatment services that did not demand abstinence -- activities known as harm reduction -- were backed by the government in response to an Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs report.
Government successes in drug policy are rare, but this is one area where the UK is a world leader. Spain, Germany, the Netherlands, Canada and Australia have had similar positive results from harm reduction policies, while countries which did not introduce them rapidly or widely enough have experienced higher HIV rates among drug injectors. The prevalence of injecting drug use is growing: There are an estimated 13 million injectors in the world, 80 percent living in developing countries where resources for public health measures are scarce.
Consequently countries in the former Soviet Union, Asia and Latin America that are facing epidemics are largely dependent on aid and the support of the UN agencies to introduce effective infection prevention. Over the last 10 years, as the evidence base for effective HIV prevention among drug users has improved, such support has, albeit slowly, been forthcoming. Many governments have provided financial aid and expertise to help affected countries introduce public health programs: The UK has been supportive in the former Soviet Union; the Soros and Gates foundations have been active in HIV prevention and the issue has been addressed through the World Health Organization, UNAIDS and the UN Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC).
These bodies issued joint statements last year confirming their support for education, treatment and syringe exchange as essential elements of any national HIV-prevention strategy. So does that mean that a good example of how to tackle a clear public health threat is set to continue? Unfortunately not.
The US has remained skeptical about harm reduction, preferring a drug policy based on enforcement and a treatment approach that demands abstinence; it also punishes continued drug use. In recent international debates on drug policy, Washington has criticized countries that deviate from the "war on drugs" approach, but it has, to some extent, accepted a focus on HIV prevention by other states.
But there are signs that this uneasy consensus is cracking and the gloves are off. The US has always been by far the biggest donor to AIDS programs. Government agencies have indicated they are uncomfortable with their aid being used to fund harm reduction, but now there are moves to cancel any US support for HIV prevention programs that include harm reduction measures: the very measures that are proven to be most effective.
RSS