On Saturday, China, a nation famed for ignoring human rights, is convening its National People's Congress, where Beijing authorities will define Taiwan, a nation respecting human rights, as an inalienable part of China's territory. It also plans to pass "anti-secession" legislation that would criminalize attempts to promote Taiwan independence and create a legal foundation for taking military action against Taiwan.
On Monday, the US State Department issued its 2004 Human Rights Report, in which it expresses disappointment over China's human rights record. It states that China has used the international war on terror as an excuse to clamp down on Uighur separatists and Muslim leaders in Xinjiang Province and on the people of Tibet. It also states that China is ruthlessly detaining political dissidents, including people expressing their views on Internet forums, religious followers, lawyers and other activists.
In contrast, the report affirms Taiwan's human rights achievements, stating that there were no political prisoners last year, nor any political persecution. The report also pointed out that opposition parties protested the election result following the assassination attempt on President Chen Shui-bian (
The report, however, also pointed to the lack of human rights for women and children here. The corruption, rape, domestic violence, prostitution and the smuggling and trade in women and children pointed out in the report do exist here. These problems deserve attention, and hopefully the ruling and opposition camps will modestly accept the US' criticism. But it is worth noting that the Domestic Violence Prevention Act (
Since the US report contains a 56,000-word section on China and an 11,000-word section on Taiwan, a detailed comparison of their human-rights record is a time-intensive procedure. But even a superficial review makes it clear that Taiwan and China are very different countries. China is demonstrating yet again what kind of country it is -- with a regime that does not respect the opinion of 23 million Taiwanese, wants to include Taiwan in its territory by legislative fiat and plans to provide a legal basis for military attacks on Taiwan.
However, the US report deserves some criticism itself when it comes to its comments about the media here. It cites pan-blue friendly sources saying that because Taiwan's market is not mature enough to support a massive media industry, certain media outlets that depend on media placement by the government and loans from government-controlled banks may not be neutral in their news coverage. What is ignored in this report is that due to the manipulations by the former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) government and a majority of media workers being Mainlanders, a large sector of the media has long favored the pan-blue camp. To make its voice heard, the Democratic Progressive Party government must rely on advertising to defend itself.
All in all, the advice given by the US is friendly and well-intentioned. For many years, it has been such friendly admonishments from Washington, together with the pride of the Taiwanese, that have turned Taiwan into an advanced country in terms of human rights. Chen's recent announcement that a future constitutional amendment will include a "National Council of Human Rights" was made as a response to the expectations of the international community and is just one more step toward improved rights for everyone.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) trip to China provides a pertinent reminder of why Taiwanese protested so vociferously against attempts to force through the cross-strait service trade agreement in 2014 and why, since Ma’s presidential election win in 2012, they have not voted in another Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate. While the nation narrowly avoided tragedy — the treaty would have put Taiwan on the path toward the demobilization of its democracy, which Courtney Donovan Smith wrote about in the Taipei Times in “With the Sunflower movement Taiwan dodged a bullet” — Ma’s political swansong in China, which included fawning dithyrambs