At a time when China is actively pursuing an "anti-secession law," Taiwan is rushing to embrace direct cargo flights across the Strait based on the flights that took place over the Lunar New Year. However, the possible negative impact of direct cargo flights is much greater than for passenger flights. The government should think twice before actively pursuing such cross-strait links.
Now that the Lunar New Year is over, Taiwan and China intend to begin negotiations about cargo flights based on the Macau talks, with the goal of establishing multi-destinational, two-way and non-stop cargo flights as a milestone in cross-strait cargo shipment.
Most Taiwanese businesspeople invest in China to take advantage of cheap land and labor. By setting up factories there, it is also easier for them to break into the Chinese market. The proposed cargo flights will help solve the transportation problems faced by Taiwanese businesses in China and facilitate shipment of various goods. But such cargo flights will inevitably accelerate the outflow of the nation's capital to China and may also act as a catalyst for the relocation of many Taiwanese industries.
On the other hand, after the opening of direct cargo flights, low-cost and low-quality products made in China will flood Taiwan's market, overwhelming domestic products. This will make it even more difficult for struggling industries to survive, forcing factory closures and escalating unemployment.
The government's plan to push ahead with cross-strait cargo flights may be intended to enhance the nation's competitiveness, but the proposed plan seems beneficial to Taiwanese businessmen in the short term and detrimental in the long run. In the short term, the plan will boost Taiwan's industries connected with China. In the long term, the side effects of the policy will certainly include the relocation of Taiwanese industries, an outflow of capital and increased unemployment -- symptoms similar to those suffered by Hong Kong prior to its reversion to Chinese rule. Just like Hong Kong, Taiwan will also not be able to resist the fate of being annexed by China.
If Taiwan were to become part of China as a consequence of a long-standing outflow of capital and the relocation of industries, the nation's economy would sink into irreparable recession. Therefore, the government must formulate a strategy to deal with the side effects caused by direct cargo flights.
The charter flights during the Lunar New Year holiday and direct cargo flights differ in one fundamental way: The former are limited to a special holiday period, while the latter would be routine flights on a daily basis. For direct passenger flights during the Lunar New Year, the government could say such flights "simulated" cargo flights across the Taiwan Strait. But the impact is going to be far greater than that of the charter flights for the Lunar New Year.
The government's cross-strait policy is described as "actively opening, effective management." While there is plenty of "opening," "effective management" is lacking. As for opening up, this can be seen in the active pursuit of direct Lunar New Year passenger and cargo flights -- and in the wake of the United Microelectronics Corp (UMC) case, it seems that the government's attitude to investment in China has also relaxed.
But we have yet to see any sign of management mechanisms being put in place that resemble an opening up of cross-strait relations. And of the mechanisms already in place, the UMC case has highlighted just how imperfect these relations are.
Therefore, before the government pushes any further in promoting direct cargo flights, a consensus among political parties and the public must be reached. The government needs to resolve the legal and economic problems that will arise as a result of direct cargo flights before entering into negotiations on the issue.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with