The attack by Palestinian gunmen on Gaza's Karni crossing on Jan. 13, in which six Israelis died, and Israel's response seem wearingly familiar. But while a year ago it would have been possible to say it was simply part of the numbing cycle of violence, inviting inevitable retaliation, this time the violence has a different and more subtle meaning.
The attack, delivered less than a week after the election of 69- year-old Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas as the successor to the late president Yasser Arafat, has already been disastrous for attempts to start a fresh dialogue between Israelis and Palestinians ahead of readoption of the road map to peace and Palestinian statehood.
If there had been some faint hope only seven days ago that more than four years of the intifada were slowly coming to an end, the Karni attack has signalled deep problems ahead.
Karni is an indication of how divided Palestinian society is. The attack was a brutal message to Abbas and all those who hope to bring the intifada to a conclusion by those Palestinians who most benefit from its continuation; a message from a younger generation that has thrown itself into the violent struggle for statehood that they will not be "sold out."
Abbas has shown in his public statements how difficult is the line he must walk: between maintaining Palestinian ambitions, including at least a symbolic refugee return, and reflecting the weariness of many Palestinians with the conflict and a desire to move, however slowly, towards some kind of a settlement.
Israelis used to say of Arafat that he would say one thing in English and another in Arabic. But Abbas's position is more difficult. No matter how much Israelis hated Arafat towards the end (and how much many Palestinians distrusted him) he remained a symbol of the Palestinian struggle. Abbas, despite his long involvement in the struggle, does not yet command the same loyalties or affection.
The risk is that he cannot control the struggles in Palestinian life that have long threatened to break out into something more menacing: between the secular and the religious; between pragmatism and the glorification of a pointless violence; between its vast and youthful population who have grown up in the West Bank and Gaza, and an ageing leadership. It is these divisions that will be in Abbas's mind as he travels to Gaza for ceasefire talks with the factions to defuse the first crisis of his presidency.
Which leaves one of the most serious questions unanswered. Confronted with attacks such as that at the Karni crossing, does he have the ability to challenge those who would rather continue with the armed struggle -- Hamas included -- and reduce the level of violence against Israelis sufficiently for Israel to act?
It is a moot point. Israel has made it clear that, if the road map is to proceed, Abbas must move against militants when they launch attacks; Abbas's response to this latest attack will determine whether he is regarded as a serious partner. In the aftermath of Karni, Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon has ordered a cessation of all contacts initiated with Palestinian leaders since Arafat's death.
The message to Abbas is clear. Unless he can deliver a hudna -- a unilaterally declared ceasefire by all the factions -- the troubling logic is of inter-factional violence within Palestinian society itself, an internalization of violence unlikely to trouble Israel.
And the aftermath of Karni leaves a critical question: how much of a reduction in violence must there be for Israel to respond with confidence-building measures on its own side? While there is an acceptance on the Israeli side that the kind of attacks that have characterized the intifada -- including suicide bombings and rocket attacks -- are unlikely to end at a stroke, it is clear that a reduction over some months will not be acceptable. Instead, Israel has made clear that it will judge the seriousness of Abbas as a partner for peace in the light of what he can achieve in the first few weeks after his inauguration.
Framed in that context, Karni is a chilling warning to Abbas of how little time he has to make a genuine impact and how difficult it will be.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.