A Pentagon advisory board has produced a searing indictment of the White House, Congress, and the State and Defense Departments for failing to fashion a communications strategy intended to burnish the tarnished image of the US around the world.
The US' ability to persuade other nations "is in crisis," says a task force report from the Defense Science Board, "and it must be transformed with a strength of purpose that matches our commitment to diplomacy, defense, intelligence, law enforcement, and homeland security."
"Policies will not succeed unless they are communicated to global and domestic audiences in ways that are credible and allow them to make informed, independent judgments," the board says. "Messages should seek to reduce, not to increase, perceptions of arrogance, opportunism, and double standards."
Those messages are carried in public diplomacy, through American Cultural Centers abroad and exchange programs that bring foreigners to the US, and public affairs offices that address the foreign press. In addition, strategic communications include broadcasts by the Voice of America and information operations that can involve controversial psychological warfare.
Missing from these efforts are strong leadership, strategic direction, adequate coordination, sufficient resources and a culture of measurement and evaluation, the report says.
While the assessment did not name President George W. Bush or the secretaries of state and defense, the authors left no doubt about to whom their appraisal referred. The Bush Administration has long been criticized for not persuading allied, friendly, and neutral nations of its intent, especially in the war on terror and the incursions into Afghanistan and Iraq.
The task force's analysis was directed largely at the inability of the Bush Administration to overcome negative attitudes toward the US held in Muslim nations such as Indonesia, Malaysia, and Pakistan.
Islam's internal and external struggle over values, identity, and change is the dominant political arena in which strategic communication takes place, the report says.
This study, however, was not limited to the Islamic world.
"The contest of ideas is taking place not just in Arab and other Islamic countries but in the cities and villages of Europe, Asia, Africa, and the Western Hemisphere," says the task force of academics, researchers from think tanks, officials within the government, and private citizens.
The task force noted that the Defense Science Board, which advises the Pentagon not just on technical issues but has a wider charter, issued an earlier report shortly after the terrorist assaults in New York and Washington on Sept. 11, 2001, urging that US strategic communication with other nations be given high priority.
Since then, about 15 other assessments have come from private institutes such as the Council on Foreign Relations, the conservative Heritage Foundation, the liberal Brookings Institution and from several Congressional committees and investigative offices. Like the Pentagon board, they have advisory influence, not operational authority.
"So far," this most recent report says, these concerns have produced no real change. The White House has paid little attention. Congressional actions have been limited to informational hearings and funding for Middle East broadcasting initiatives.
Little has been done to counter the daily barrage of anti-American propaganda that issues from the likes of al-Jazeera, which was founded in the Persian Gulf state of Qatar in 1996 and has since become the Muslim world's best known TV network. More TV stations and publications, although lesser known in the West, "are creating the frames within which people understand and misunderstand events and US political goals," the report says. Add to that cell phones, wireless handhelds, video, camcorders, digital cameras and the Internet even though its use in the Middle East is the lowest in the world.
The task force recommended a thorough overhaul of the government's communications apparatus, including appointing a senior official in the National Security Council to oversee the effort and establishing an independent, non-partisan Center for Strategic Communication as a joint government-private venture.
The task force warns, moreover, that "we will not succeed in revitalizing strategic communication if we tinker around the edges. Given the enormous challenges we fact, we can succeed only if we use all the instruments of national power." It proposes changes in the Departments of State and Defense, in US embassies everywhere, and in the military's combatant commands. This history of the Bush Administration's indifference to strategic communications over the last five years, however, does not give rise to the prospect that much will be done.
Richard Halloran is a journalist in based Hawaii.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations