Toward the end of last year, many lexicographers agreed that the word of the year was blog, from "Web log," with its extension of bloggers, commentators with Internet addresses who had joined the panjandrums of political media.
Then disaster struck. The word to describe the event that will fix the year in the history of geologic catastrophe and the resulting human tragedy is tsunami, from the Japanese tsu, "harbor," and nami, "waves."
At first report, many of us called the cataclysm a tidal wave. That's imprecise; the Oxford English Dictionary defines its primary sense as "the high water wave caused by the movement of the tide," noting that the common belief that it was a huge wave caused by an earthquake was mistaken. An 1899 citation from The Daily News of Perth, Australia, explained the difference: "The tidal wave sweeps round the earth twice in the 24 hours; the great wave produced by an earthquake, erroneously described sometimes as a `tidal wave,' has nothing tidal about it, and it is called by scientific men `a free wave."'
Journalists a century later who turned to The New York Times Manual of Style and Usage in writing about the Asian flooding were reminded of the difference: "Tidal wave is restricted in scientific terminology to a sea wave that is due chiefly to the effects of lunar gravity. For the wave induced by an earthquake or submarine landslide, tsunami is the correct scientific term. Because it is relatively obscure, tsunami should be explained."
Obscure no more. "`Tsunami!' shrieked the people; and then all shrieks and all sounds and all power to hear sounds were annihilated by a nameless shock ... as the colossal swell smote the shore with a weight that sent a shudder through the hills." That was a description in 1897 by Lafcadio Hearn, an Irish-American reporter who became a Japanese citizen, traveling through what he called the "Buddha-fields." Reports of the tsunami of our time, with front-page color photos and televised footage of the dead and the suffering survivors, brought to the world the horror in Asia on what is being called Black Sunday. A NASA geophysicist reported that the quake, and the huge, nearly supersonic waves it caused, resulted in the planet tilting about 2.5cm on its axis and spinning 3 microseconds faster. Rarely does the word earth-shaking have a literal sense.
We are more accustomed to the figurative use of disaster vocabulary. Mark Twain wrote his publisher in 1870 to "have somebody standing ready to launch a book right on our big tidal wave and swim it into a success." In last year's campaign, Newsweek praised two former aides to Senator Ted Kennedy: "Both should take enormous credit for helping Kerry survive the Howard Dean tsunami." And The New York Times accurately predicted the Democratic ticket would carry New York "barring a tsunami of a sweep." For a time, in light of the impact of a real rather than metaphoric disaster, political writers will hesitate to use the metaphor that causes so many shudders, reverting instead to the less fearsome landslide, avalanche,surge and firestorm. Like holocaust, the word tsunami must now be used with sensitivity.
Disaster Synonymy
"Disaster is etymologically a mishap due to a baleful stellar aspect," wrote William Whitney, a predecessor of mine, in 1875. Right on: astrum is Latin for "star," and the stars were believed to foretell destiny, fortune, fate or hap (meaning "luck"). In Hamlet, Shakespeare's Horatio bewailed "Stars with trains of fire and dews of blood, Disasters in the sun ..."
In current usage, disaster is the general term for "everything going wrong." Because of its frequent, loose, inclusive use -- from a specific ruination, failure or misfortune to an exaggerated "that outfit is a disaster" and as an attributive noun in disaster area or disaster movie -- the word is losing some of its fearsomeness. We are not discussing mere fiascos, debacles or misfortunes; in the synonymy of disaster, there are the three c's: catastrophe, calamity and cataclysm.
Catastrophe is a Latin and Greek word for "overthrowing or overturning; a sudden ending." In ancient theater, a play began with a protasis, or introduction, and ended with a catastrophe, or conclusion, driven by some irresistible cause; in French, that finish was the "denouement." That was Shakespeare's meaning in "King Lear," when the bastard Edmund says of his brother "pat, he comes, like the catastrophe of the old comedy." (When the Bard turned bawd, however, he played on the second syllable: "Away you scullion ... I'll tickle your catastrophe." In the same irreverent spirit, a mock-furious Jimmy Durante would say "It's a catastrastroke!" -- a creative meld of catastrophe and thunderstroke, "a clap of thunder accompanied by a streak of lightning.")
Over the centuries, the sudden ending evolved into some horrendous finality: Charles Darwin, in his 1859 "Origin of Species," derided "the old notion of all the inhabitants of the earth having been swept away by catastrophes." He was dismissing the "theory of cataclysms" or "doctrine of violent upheavals" that held that population was recreated after all life was periodically destroyed.
Calamity, from the Latin for "damage," now means an event causing distress in multitudes feeling grievous personal loss. Merriam-Webster's invaluable 1984 Dictionary of Synonyms gives this example: "the rout at Bull Run was a disaster for the North, but the assassination of President Lincoln was a calamity." The heavy word was lightened up by a frontier prostitute, sharpshooter and heroine of Deadwood, South Dakota, who famously warned, "If you scorn Martha Jane Cannary, you court calamity."
Cataclysm is the Greek word for "deluge; to wash over, as a wave," especially directed at the Flood in which the biblical Noah survived. In 1637, the playwright Thomas Heywood called it "the first Universal Cataclisme." Though it is used about other natural and political upheavals, its central semantic element is watery doom. That makes cataclysm, in my book, the most apt name for the tsunami of 2004.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.