How much ignorance and selfishness does it take to regard the suffering of others as an opportunity for one's personal gain?
We cannot do much but accept the fact that many innocent lives were claimed by the natural tsunamis on Dec. 26, while countless others lost their homes and are suffering from a shortage of supplies. In this light, it is very difficult for anyone with human feelings not to feel angry and upset about the selfishness and cold attitudes shown by some Taiwanese people and media outlets toward those suffering as a result of this disaster.
Control Yuan President Fredrick Chien (
According to the media, after confirming that "the golf court is located in the mountains, and that the hotel to stay next to the court has remained unaffected" and "his personal safety, transportation, food and accommodation is not a problem," Chien went to Phuket to "make his wish come true."
There is nothing wrong with playing golf. But why play it now, while victims and rescuers are in need of food and drinkable water? How can Chien think only about his pleasure when others in the same area are working so desperately to deal with the tragic aftermath of the tsunami? As a very high-level government official, how does he intend to lead Taiwanese society with the kind of "courage and insistence" he shows in this matter?
Prior to the disaster, hardly any Taiwanese media outlets bothered to station reporters in Southeast Asia. I have not seen any particularly valuable news stories filed by Taiwanese reporters who have recently entered Sri Lanka, India, Thailand or Indonesia in order to capture the "usual" tragic disaster scenes.
The "best" bits of information they have offered thus far -- compared to the international media -- was in ruthlessly forcing Taiwanese victims and their families to speak on camera.
Take the senseless reporter who asked a tearful old man who'd lost his son "How will your family carry on with their lives?" knowing full well that the deceased was the main income earner in the family.
Another reporter went to disturb a six-year-old girl who was just rescued from a coconut tree with the question: "How many days has it been since you've had breakfast?" Worse still was the reporter who insisted on asking a husband whose wife remains missing, "how do you feel now?"
Anyone with a heart would know how these people feel. Who needs cold-blooded reporters to raise such cruel questions?
The tourism sector in southern Taiwan came out and said bluntly that Kenting could "seize the opportunity" of attracting tourists who would otherwise vacation in tsunami-affected areas.
Then on Dec. 30, a major Taiwanese daily published a criticism of the nation's failed diplomatic strategy. Instead of insisting that Taiwan should quickly join the international rescue efforts based on humanitarian concerns, it asked, "how can Taiwan's aid involvement be a positive engagement of the Thai and Indonesian governments," thus equating humanitarian concerns with potential diplomatic gain.
It is worrisome that some businessmen and opinion leaders are either ignorant, aloof to the suffering of others, or are so selfish that they will try every possible way to gain from others' pain. How can Taiwan claim that it is ready to join the international community -- and expect others to help it with humanitarian or human rights concerns when this country is in need of support?
Chiting Serena Chuang is the International Affairs Director of the Taiwan Association for Human Rights.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under