To help relieve tsunami-devastated South Asian countries, countries around the world have one after another increased the amount of money they have pledged in aid. The US has now committed US$350 million, up from the US$15 million it originally pledged. Japan also raised its aid from US$30 million to US$500 million, making it the top donor country.
Taiwan didn't lag behind, and upped its pledge from US$5 million to US$50 million. I am sure that the people of Taiwan are delighted with and support the government's decision. In fact, many local social groups and schools have already taken the initiative to appeal for private donations for tsunami relief.
When the government decided to increase disaster-relief funding, the reasons were: the hope that Taiwan could be included in the list of top 10 donor nations, to increase Taiwan's visibility in the international community, and at the same time increase other countries' willingness to support Taiwan's participation in the World Health Organization (WHO).
Too much emphasis on political motivation of donations at the expense of stating the importance of compassion and the severity of disaster may make people (especially in recipient countries) consider the donations conditional on political benefits.
As a result, the compassion felt by 23 million Taiwanese people may be tainted with hypocrisy.
Whether it is "the Republic of China (ROC)," "ROC, Taiwan," "Taiwan, ROC," "China Taipei," " Chinese Taipei," "Taiwan," or "the Separate Customs Territory of Taiwan, Penghu, Kinmen and Matsu," our country is an "abnormal" and "unique" nation that has been degraded, discriminated against and ignored.
As a result, no wonder Taiwan must defend itself in a diplomatic setting by constantly considering mutual-benefit exchanges and feedback from the international community to seek recognition or other political advantage.
But is this emphasis on political incentives and purposes in public announcements or in international media when extending political, economic or emergency aid to others beneficial? This is a question that our government should consider.
A few years ago when the government promoted the second phase of the "go south" policy (
Once, when Taiwan contributed funding to the second-track (or non-governmental) regional security cooperation forum, an Indonesian diplomat advised Taiwan that its insistence on linking this funding with diplomatic conditions was not the best means of attaining its ends.
Take Taiwan's 2003 SARS outbreak as an example. Excessively manipulating the situation for political gain only had a negative impact on Taiwan's participation in the WHO.
Taiwan's donations for tsunami relief spring from the highest moral motives, and demonstrate the government's diplomatic commitment to actively promote human rights and humanitarian aid. But good policies and intentions are only be undermined by politicized explanations.
Although all countries have their own foreign-policy considerations when providing international disaster relief or humanitarian aid, it is important to "do more and talk less," and especially to refrain from emphasizing supplementary conditions in public announcements.
Song Yann-huei is a research fellow and deputy director at the Institute of European and American Studies at the Academia Sinica.
TRANSLATED BY LIN YA-TI
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry