Reform, when long discussed but never implemented, can do far more harm than good. Anticipation of a reform -- say, of pension rules, the health system, or unemployment benefits -- worries everyone who might feel the impact. In response, people cut consumption and save more, expecting that sooner or later they will have to start paying for some of the services they had been used to getting free or at subsidized rates.
But because reform in Europe is usually discussed rather than implemented, the benefits fail to materialize: people work harder only when they are sure that tax rates are actually cut, and in financial markets the positive effects of lower government spending do not come before any reform is approved. In the meantime, as politicians debate and do nothing, consumer confidence falls, economic performance worsens, and the consensus needed to get reforms approved in the first place vanishes. Still the talk does not stop, nor does the fall in consumer confidence.
Germany's recent experience provides a worrying example of this vicious circle. Reform of Germany's generous social system has claimed the front pages for German papers for more than 10 years. Some timid measures have been implemented, but the general feeling among Germans is best described by the following answer to a survey conducted two months ago by the newspaper Die Welt: "47 percent of those interviewed plan to cut consumption due to the uncertainty about pensions and health reform."
The result has been a sharp fall in consumer confidence: the German index of consumer sentiment was small but positive in November 2000; it has since fallen to minus 20, the sharpest decline in the euro zone.
Out on the street, pessimism runs rampant. For two years now, the growth rate of private consumption (measured at constant prices) has been negative: minus 1 percent in 2002 and minus 0.5 percent in 2003. Similar declines in real consumption are rare in industrial countries, because in bad years consumers typically draw on their savings to keep their consumption relatively constant. In the case of Germany, one has to go back to the early 1980s to see similar negative numbers in consumption growth. As a result, rather than falling, the household saving rate has increased, rising from 9.7 percent of disposable income in 2000 to 11.8 percent last year.
Depressed consumption and higher savings have affected all age groups, but the relatively old have been more prone to the trend than the relatively young. The only positive signs in consumption are seen among the youngest households, those headed by people in their early 20s, who evidently hope that sooner or later the reforms will be approved and their tax burden reduced. But the saving rate even in households in their 30s has risen along with concern about reforms.
Not surprisingly, elderly people cut consumption more. With retirement, they have lost almost all options: they can no longer work more, nor can they sign up for private health plans -- the insurance premiums at their age are too high. So they are forced to rely on their savings, and virtually stop consuming. Put this in the context of a rapidly aging population, and the effects on overall consumption are dramatic.
Interestingly, France is the only large Euro-zone country where consumer confidence is growing (from minus 24 a year ago to minus 13 today). The reason is simple: as next year's elections approach, reforms have been shifted off the political agenda.
If a government does not have the will to adopt a reform program, then the best thing it can do is stop talking about reform altogether. This may start happening in Germany and for the same reason: consumer confidence remains lackluster.
Europe's economy grew at an anemic 1.8 percent annual rate last year, and the OECD has recently revised downward its growth forecast for next year, from 2.5 to 1.9 percent, owing to the rising euro and the fall in exports -- so far the only driver of the euro-zone economies. The common wisdom is that faster European growth requires a boost from domestic demand. But this will not happen as long as politicians keep talking about reforms while doing virtually nothing to realize them. On the contrary, all they are doing is spreading pessimism.
Europe has two ways ahead. It can forget about reform and enjoy the four or five decades it will take for its per capita income to fall below the level of, say, Chile, or it can deeply change its social model and start growing like the US. Doing nothing but talking, which is Europe's current model of inaction, is the worst possible course.
Alberto Alesina is a professor of economics at Harvard University and Francesco Giavazzi is a professor of economics at Bocconi University, Milan.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.