The US is shifting loyalties
Recent remarks from Washington emphasizing how Taiwan's defense would need to be decided by a congressional vote should come as no surprise. America is gradually and publicly distancing itself from its previous stance in defense of Taiwan.
This is just the latest example of the US demonstrating where its loyalties are. Sadly it is is no longer in protecting lands of democracy, freedom and where the rule of law is upheld. It is in protecting lands where the largest deposits of fossil fuel are situated, where autocrats and puppets rule, and where the most money is to be made. It has become clear that Taiwan's guardian angel for the last five decades is getting cold feet and is leaning ever closer to the other side of the Strait.
Economics has everything to do with why the US stance on Taiwan is beginning to drift. Taiwan's time as the factory for middle America has passed with only a few technologically advanced manufacturers left in the country; everything else has been shipped to China's burgeoning cities and sweatshops.
The US has the gall to chastise the EU for considering lifting its arms embargo against China. They don't do this out of concern for Taiwan, but for fear that in the not too distant future the arms will be used against their troops. One may ask -- why locate all its factories in China in the first place? This gave China the means to develop into Asia's hegemonic state.
The answer is simple: corporate greed. It is obvious that big business now rules Capitol Hill, and big business has set up shop in the middle kingdom. Keeping the wheels of the behemoth economy turning is now more important to the US than foreign wars and the resulting casualties.
Maintaining the "status quo" is just the most convenient method for the US to sustain its economic prominence. What is the mantra now emanating from Washington towards Taipei? It is simply "defend yourself." How?
By spending billions of dollars on weapons, which also keeps the US economy ticking. By preserving the "status quo" the US remains in a win-win situation, selling arms to Taiwan and taking advantage of China's cheap labor.
The people of Taiwan should be alarmed, because despite the disgraceful way they have been treated of late, the US is still their one and only friend on the world stage. If the US suddenly deserted Taiwan, who else would Taiwan have? The rest of the hypocrites in the developed world would stand back and watch its destruction should China ever invade, with maybe a diplomatic protestation or two. Taiwan needs to stand up for itself in the face of this degrading diplomatic bullying.
The message to Taiwan is to take action now, before the country sinks further into China's economic shadow, while Taiwan still holds sway with US business and the military balance is still slightly in Taiwan's favor. China still has something to lose in the great propaganda coup that is the 2008 Olympics.
Preserving the "status quo" only serves the interest of Beijing and the US, not Taiwan. Meantime, China continues its relentless arms buildup. Taiwan becomes economically weaker and loses its military edge, while the US carries on with its hopeless cross-strait balancing act.
This is not about an outright declaration of independence, but something along the lines of the name-change proposed by Chen Shui-bian and the new constitution. These types of moves may provoke Beijing into limited action, exposing the true nature of this authoritarian ogre to the rest of the world, while gaining Taiwan some much-deserved international support. This would also force the US government into demonstrating whether they really stand for defending freedom and democracy.
The only people in Taiwan who advocate the "status quo" are the business leaders who have already betrayed the Taiwanese people by shipping their jobs across the strait to increase profits, and pan-blue politicians who cause chaos in the legislature by holding up the very arms purchase that they initiated.
They are the same people who pretend to care about the people of Taiwan, but whose offspring avoid military service, and who would be on the first plane with their US passports in hand at the first sign of trouble.
The "status quo" is a facade that Taiwan should no longer attempt to preserve.
The people of Taiwan stood up once before when they won freedom and democracy from the KMT dictatorship.
Now they need to stand up again to win their rightful place amongst the democratic nations of the world.
Richard Hazeldine
Taipei
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with