There is certainly more than one reason why any election is won or lost. The mathematical concepts of set theory or even probability theory are useful tools for logically and thoroughly analyzing the outcome of an election.
The people of Taiwan directly elected the president for the first time in 1996. In response to the direct election that highlighted Taiwan's sovereignty, China attempted to deter the Taiwanese people by launching a missile drill.
Fortunately, then president Lee Teng-hui (
About 75 percent of the public voted for either Lee or Peng Ming-min (
As for the green camp's failure in last month's legislative elections, the reasons were rather complex, and different experts have come up with their own analyses. Basically, their analyses are mostly correct but incomplete.
I tend to analyze elections in terms of mathematical set theory. In the latest elections, the number of votes cast dropped compared with the elections in 2000. I agree that many factors that have been mentioned by experts did play a role, including inappropriate nominations, vote-allocation techniques, factions and bribery.
But what I am concerned with is the Taiwanese people's fear -- a factor not even the ruling party has noticed. In the three presidential elections in 1996, 2000 and 2004, the Taiwanese people's reaction was anger in the face of China's threats. They bravely cast their ballots in favor of the candidates Beijing disliked.
But in the legislative elections, the US opposition to the pan-green camp's push for a new constitution and a national name change generated fear among voters. The turnout rate declined from over 80 percent in the March presidential election to about 59 percent. Both pan-blue and pan-green supporters were surely included in the set formed by those who did not vote this time.
If we deduct all the subsets formed by those who were too lazy to vote and those who were disappointed by the government's performance and the unrest created by the pan-blue camp, the remainder were people who feared the US reaction, worrying that voting for the pan-green camp may push Washington away.
The Taiwanese people are seldom angry at their American friends. Since their fear was greater than their anger, not voting seemed to be inevitable.
If China carefully calculates the Taiwanese people's fear, comes up with the necessary steps to turn anger into fear, and forces the Taiwanese authorities to accept an unfavorable interim agreement that may turn the nation into the next Hong Kong through brinksmanship, the annexation of Taiwan by China will only be a matter of time.
It is already impossible for President Chen Shui-bian (
Hsiao Chih-ru is a professor in the Department of Mathematics at Soochow University.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with