In Taiwan, people almost daily hear about incidents of kidnapping, coercion, homicide, looting, disfigurement [by others] with sulfuric acid, assault, shootings and other criminal cases. On top of these crimes, the emergence of all sorts of dangerous behavior, such as the recent "rice" and gas bombings, makes our society increasingly violent. The country's fierce political battles often overshadow the issue of violent crime, although the media tend to cover individual incidents extensively. Domestic violence, child abuse, sexual violence, gang wars and other social problems occur all the time, and the public needs to be aware of the huge social toll violence exacts.
According to statistics compiled by the Ministry of the Interior's National Police Administration, an average of around 10,000 violent crimes have occurred each year over the past 10 years. From January to November this year, 11,353 violent crimes (including homicide, kidnapping, armed robbery, assault, extortion and rape) were reported. From January to October, district courts prosecuted 2,166 people for alleged violations of the Statute Regulating Firearms, Ammunition, Knives and Other Deadly Weapons (
Violent crime not only harms people physically through disfigurement, infertility, hearing and visual impairment, brain damage, HIV infection and so on, it also causes psychological problems, which can take the form of depression, mood swings, drug abuse, post-traumatic stress disorder, nightmares, anxiety, fear and fatigue.
A study conducted by the US Department of Justice confirmed that victims of criminal violence suffer the additional burdens of having to pay for medical and psychological treatment, a loss of income and a decrease in productivity, as well as intangible losses, such as a reduction in the quality of life. These losses can even influence the nation's economy. Without doubt, every country, society and individual must pay the price for criminal violence.
Faced with the prevalence of violence in society, we need to be aware that violent crimes are usually preceded by danger signs, such as frequent quarrels, fights, verbal or written threats and other similar indicators. We should be on the lookout for these signs and refrain from verbal provocation to prevent any possible tragedy. The government should address the prevention of violence from a very fundamental level. People should be encouraged to attend courses on anger management, interpersonal relationship skills and promoting their "emotional quotient." The police administration and the justice department should continue to enforce gun control measures and severely punish any violent act to prevent further tragedies.
No matter what the causes of violence are, a person who commits a violent crime should not be allowed to escape their responsibilities, even if they claim to have acted with high-minded motives or because of mental illness. They should be held responsible for inflicting irreversible fear and pain on their victims and the general public; otherwise, how can social justice be achieved?
Finally, preventing violence is the responsibility of every citizen. We should act with a sense of social justice and reject violence. In this way, we can finally bring back a safe living environment.
Yang Shu-lung is a professor of the Graduate Institute of Criminology at National Chung-Cheng University.
TRANSLATED BY LIN YA-TI
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations