Developing countries are blessed with some of the world's most precious natural resources. But that blessing can also be a curse -- and not just for oil-rich countries, with their distorted economies and politics.
Latin American countries in the Amazon region, for example, are home to what can rightly be considered the world's storehouse of biodiversity. Yet, when it comes to protecting this global treasure, these countries are expected to shoulder the burden by themselves.
Even with good intentions, these countries on their own are unlikely to ensure that the benefits of conserving the Amazon are realized, because private interests in deforestation -- both legal and illegal -- remain very strong. The prospect of quick gains from occupying publicly owned forestland induces private individuals to grab and clear as much of these areas as quickly as possible, without regard for the environmental and social impact of their behavior.
The need to supply fuel and open land during rapid economic development had a devastating effect on European and American forests. Brazil, too, has in recent decades depleted much of its forestland, only at faster rates.
Five hundred years ago, the Atlantic rainforest stretched nearly the entirety of Brazil's 8,500km coastline; today, less than 7 percent remains. More than 15 percent of the Brazilian Amazon has been deforested, most of it in the last 50 years. Last year, the Brazilian Amazon lost 23,750km2 of forest -- an area nearly the size of Belgium.
The tragedy is that much of this deforestation has been entirely unnecessary from the standpoint of economic development. For example, since 1990 Brazil has increased grain production by 125 percent, with an increase of only 24 percent in cultivated area. But, at the same time, more than 16 million hectares of pastures and degraded land -- an area half the size of Germany -- have been abandoned in the Amazon alone, owing to poor agricultural practices and land use. With their rehabilitation, Brazil could expand agricultural production without further harm to the rainforest.
In this and other ways, the rainforest could be harnessed to finance development and generate growth in a socially inclusive and sustainable way. But to achieve this, the countries and the international community need to act.
Developing countries need to ensure reliable property rights and policy enforcement in order to generate the incentives needed to protect nature in the future. To its credit, the Brazilian government has revoked policies that had previously encouraged land clearing in the Amazon, and has mandated that 80 percent of privately owned forestland be used only for sustainable management of forest resources. Brazil has also developed a sophisticated system to track and record deforestation -- though monitoring an area the size of Europe with scarce resources is by itself unlikely to lead to much compliance.
As a result, there needs to be far greater support from the international community for promising initiatives. Consider these examples.
The partnership between the Brazilian Government, the World Wide Fund for Nature, the World Bank, and the international community has been the basis for the Amazon Region Protected Areas Program, which seeks to set aside 12 percent of the Amazon for conservation.
The Pilot Program to Conserve the Brazilian Rainforests, funded by the Brazilian government and the G7 countries, has provided US$420 million in the past decade for alternatives to deforestation. Where these programs have been implemented, little deforestation has occurred.
The World Bank, through a recently approved US$505 million loan, is supporting the inclusion of environmental issues and concerns across Brazil's government ministries.
The Kyoto Protocol's Clean Development Mechanism allows for the trade of carbon credits for reforestation. This mechanism could help establish a system to pay for the maintenance of standing forests and support policies that comprehend the Amazon's global value.
These are encouraging developments. But much remains to be done -- and the need is urgent. The Amazon is one of the world's greatest environmental and biological treasures. The global community needs to treat it as such by ratcheting up the effort to maintain and protect it.
Vinod Thomas is a World Bank vice president and country director for Brazil.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations