Human influence at least doubled the risk of last year's Europe-wide heatwave. That is the conclusion of leading scientists who say they are more than 90 percent sure of the fact. The research, published in Nature magazine, is a significant milestone on the road to establishing liability for climate change damage.
It boosts the argument that greenhouse gas emissions have increased temperatures both globally and regionally, and it brings nearer the day when courts will be asked to decide where liability lies.
This "detection and attribution science," as it is known, lies behind the many efforts of lawyers and campaigners around the world to enforce the law to combat the causes and impacts of climate change.
In 2001, the world's scientists said that globally, most of the warming was due to human activities. Since then, at least three peer-reviewed papers have revealed human influence on regional temperatures; human influence, found for the first time, on a climate variable other than temperature - sea-level pressure; and now "the first successful attempt to detect man-made influence on a specific extreme climatic event," according to Christoph Schar, at the Institute for Atmospheric and Climate Science in Zurich, and Gerd Jendritzky, of the German Weather Service.
The courts have already responded positively to these findings. The legal relevance of climate change has now been accepted by US and Australian judges in cases where decisions leading to more coal mining and electricity transmission were found to be illegal. And a California appeals judge has rejected the idea that "injury to all is injury to none" where "global environmental impact is threatened by a federal statutory wrong."
In addition, the range of legal theories used is broadening. Cases began in 2002, with the collaboration of US cities, non- governmental organizations and citizens against the US export-credit bodies. These were followed by US states, American Samoa, cities and NGOs challenging the failure of the US environmental protection agency to regulate greenhouse gas emissions under the Clean Air Act.
These are what lawyers call traditional public law cases. Since then, the Inuit Circumpolar Conference has announced its development of a case against the US in the InterAmerican Commission for Human Rights, alleging violations of Inuit human rights.
Climate change litigation arrived in Europe in June this year, when NGOs went to court under freedom of information rules to challenge the German government's secrecy about export credit support for fossil fuel projects since 1997.
Meanwhile, in Argentina, citizens have successfully used the Accion Informativa mechanism (whereby public bodies, where responsible, are legally required to respond to questions from the public) after the Santa Fe floods, the country's worst climate-related disaster.
The first private law action was brought in July by eight US states, New York city and NGOs against the five main US power companies, arguing for a court order to compel them to reduce their emissions of carbon dioxide. And in November, the impact of climate change on some of the most beautiful parts of the planet was highlighted when an alliance of NGOs, climbers and others initiated legal moves in Unesco to protect Mount Everest, world heritage glaciers in the Andes and coral reefs in Belize from the impacts of climate change.
One of the impacts highlighted by the Everest petition is the formation of glacial lakes that have already been officially designated as at risk of bursting their banks. Many of these high altitude lakes did not exist 50 years ago, and experts still do not know how many there are. But we do know that large chunks of melting glaciers can break off and fall into these lakes, or that ice in the dam walls can melt and weaken the dam. If these lakes burst, huge torrents of water and debris would cause catastrophic damage to life and property downstream.
It is unfair and unnecessary for communities in developing countries to remain the passive victims of damaging corporate activities and of inadequate government response. But could, for example, Nepalese people living below these lakes sue to make the companies that have benefited hugely from fossil fuel production now accept the burden of paying for the results of their activities? They will need the kind of science published in Nature to help them, and they will need to identify the companies responsible.
Certainly, pinpointing those responsible is becoming easier, thanks to developments in contribution analysis. Credible efforts have already been made to calculate the contribution of companies such as ExxonMobil to climate change, and next year a Defra-funded group of climate scientists will publish their robust methodology for modelling and assessing contributions to climate change.
Climate change litigation, supported by strong science, has started with a vengeance. Tomorrow we will take this message to the world's governments gathered in Buenos Aires. Several challenges remain, but one thing is clear: for as long as politicians and industry refuse to make the big cuts in emissions that are needed, and to compensate those facing damage, the judges will be asked to sort it out.
Peter Roderick is co-director of the Climate Justice Program. Details: www.climatelaw.org
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) trip to China provides a pertinent reminder of why Taiwanese protested so vociferously against attempts to force through the cross-strait service trade agreement in 2014 and why, since Ma’s presidential election win in 2012, they have not voted in another Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate. While the nation narrowly avoided tragedy — the treaty would have put Taiwan on the path toward the demobilization of its democracy, which Courtney Donovan Smith wrote about in the Taipei Times in “With the Sunflower movement Taiwan dodged a bullet” — Ma’s political swansong in China, which included fawning dithyrambs