The blue camp could hardly hide its excitement after winning the elections, while the green camp suffered a defeat, surprisingly losing over 2.2 million votes compared to the March presidential election. The green camp therefore pointed its fingers at its highest leader. With his unique campaign style, President Chen Shui-bian (
Perhaps the best explanation is that it was a result of the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) supporters' protest against Chen's political line, as they were in fact dissatisfied with the changeable and inconsistent style of his leadership, as well as the DPP's incapacity to push for reforms.
Thus, the problem lies in Chen's sincerity and ability to implement policies. Although he is very good at stimulating emotional recognition through abstract political rhetoric, the trick has been overused. The exaggerated words are leading to a crisis for his political credibility. Looking back at his public support after coming to power in 2000, his handling of the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant made us feel that he dared not take responsibility for a major policy like this, and his support ratings dropped below 40 percent for the first time.
Later, when the nation's first-ever referendum on national security failed, Chen, the initiator of the referendum, made no comment, as if those who supported it had to take responsibility on their own. But he did not learn from this, as his exaggerated campaign remarks this time pushed the US to claim that Taiwan is not an independent sovereign state. What a significant strike against the public's morale that was.
Again and again, those in power repeatedly wear away their reformist image established ever since the dangwai movement (outside the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT)) movement and abuse those firm supporters of Taiwan's democratization. The green camp's loss of votes this time was a blow for failing to keep its promises on reforms.
Over the past few years, a ridiculous comment can often be heard: no one inside the DPP can take responsibility for the stagnancy of reforms but Chen himself. This is absurd! Is he the only one who is running the nation? Do the party's high-level officials dare not advise him? Isn't there any internal force of restraint?
Some say that outspoken DPP Legislator Shen Fu-hsiung's (
Why has this "winter cicada effect" occurred inside the once self-critical party? The problem is due to party members' "conformism" -- their collective conformity in thought and belief. Today, the party's priority is to continue to stay in power, and the premise for this priority is to win elections. Since Chen is considered an election genius, everyone follows his lead. This is not only voluntary obedience but also collective irresponsibility, as the green camp is cutting its own throat.
Those who calmly support democracy are watching, those who have sacrificed themselves for democracy are condemning, and those who miss authoritarian rule in the past are laughing -- because the DPP has not long ago lost the word "progressive" from its name.
Wu Jieh-min is an associate professor in the Graduate Institute of Sociology at National Tsing Hua University.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with