Looking back over the turbulent year that is now coming to an end, one is tempted to focus on what US leaders have come to call the Greater Middle East. Such a survey would obviously take us to Iraq, to Israel and Palestine -- and to terrorism.
Lasting peace in the Middle East could lead to greater prosperity and cooperation in the world. But if we take a wider view, the problems of the Middle East appear to be but one aspect of deeper shifts among the powers
ILLUSTRATION MOUNTAIN PEOPLE
of the world. Indeed, tectonic changes became visible this year. We have begun to see the "powers of the future," to borrow the title of former German chancellor Helmut Schmidt's recent bestselling book.
Schmidt is certain of two developments. The US remains the key player, and China's power will continue to grow. He is less certain about the future of Europe, Russia and the Middle East.
To be sure, this year has seen the confirmation of America's hard power -- and its voters' choice of a politics of values rather than of interests. Americans may not want their soldiers and military hardware in dozens, if not hundreds, of places around the world, but they accept a president who offers simple -- often martial -- certainties.
One may also wonder whether this president could lead them in another direction, to traditional Republican isolationism. After all, it is the Democrats who have traditionally taken the US to war. In any case, security guaranteed by military power will continue to be an American concern.
But while America's hard power dominates the world scene, its soft power declined this year. The US lost some of its attractiveness for many, and Americans are unpopular in many parts of the world. The decline in overseas visitors, and notably in the number of foreign students in the US, is the immediate result of stricter visa laws, but it is an important factor in the weakening of the US' global hegemony.
Soft power begins with economic power. America's twin fiscal and trade deficits may prove to be solvable problems, but new ways will have to be tried to resolve them. At a recent conference, US government representatives were unimpressed by European pleas to do something about the deficits -- and the falling dollar that has resulted from them.
"That is not a European problem," the Americans responded. "It is an issue between us and China."
All at once, China is rapidly emerging as a growing economic force. It not only has considerable dollar reserves, but has also become the manufacturing capital of the world. American and European jobs increasingly migrate to China. Early hints at the reaction could be heard in the American presidential election campaign, with the frequent protests against outsourcing and China's pegged exchange rate. But the trend will not be stopped. It is surely only a matter of time -- a short time -- before China makes its political and military weight felt.
This leaves an uncertain future for Russia and those still in the Russian orbit, like Ukraine. This year witnessed a decline in democracy and the rule of law across what Russian President Vladimir Putin calls the "former Soviet space." The problem is a challenge especially for Europe.
At first sight, this year was a good year for the EU, with enlargement to 25 members completed in May a notable success. Enlargement was not only a triumph for democracy and the rule of law in the postcommunist countries to the west of Russia, but it is also an indication of the magnetism of the EU, and thus of its soft power.
Eastward expansion of the EU enables the New Europe to emulate the economic dynamism of other recent members, like Spain and Ireland. Enlargement has produced a union confident enough to engage more explicitly -- and even with elements of hard power -- in the Balkans, Afghanistan, and elsewhere. It has also provided the courage to open accession negotiations with Turkey.
Yet one cannot help agreeing with Schmidt when he sees Europe's future shrouded in uncertainty. There is no clear recognition of the fact that Europe's soft power means little unless it is allied with the hard power of the US. But there was no progress this year in recreating a transatlantic partnership that recognizes the massive changes occurring in world affairs. Pathetic attempts to go it alone have not made Europe stronger, and anti-Americanism harms Europe more than the US.
Thus, at the end of this year, the most important global task remains unresolved: creation of a confident nucleus for the Free World. An alliance of those who espouse and practice liberal democracy might provide a pole of certainty in a highly uncertain world. Let us hope that next year will bring us a few steps closer to that objective.
Ralf Dahrendorf is a member of the British House of Lords, a former rector of the London School of Economics and a former warden of St. Antony's College, Oxford.
Copyright: Project Syndicate/Institute for Human Sciences
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under