Australia's dollar diplomacy
I am writing in response to the recent developments in Vanuatu and previous comments made by Wayne Kerr (Letters. Dec. 9, page 8) about Australia's South Pacific foreign policy and his comments about Taiwan taking advantage of instability in Vanuatu. Kerr's comments imply that Australia is benevolent and the others -- Taiwan and Vanuatu -- have been mischievous. He doesn't condemn China. I think that when it comes to Beijing/Canberra relations, Kerr is indeed being naive.
Australia would have definitely been contacted by Beijing and pressured to react. It seems to me that they did react but under a different pretext of hegemonic saber-rattling, and also, because of the timing, placated China by maintaining their "one China" policy.
Furthermore, what Australia may view as corruption and bad governance in Vanuatu may be seen as the contrary in Vanuatu. Vanuatu is traditionally a chiefdom employing the gift-exchange economy. Giving gifts is common in this region. Kinship corporations exist in which family members are strategically placed in positions in the bureaucracy and employed overseas, the latter bringing in much needed remittance payments that maintain the well-being of those back home in rural communities where the nuclear family exists.
Australia, the US and China are opposed to this informal system of economics, and since these people are on the periphery of the modern world system they are marginalized. To develop according to "modern" standards, the Australian government has been providing aid to them. Aid money becomes expected. They tend to rely too much on it and accept it as natural because it is no longer embarrassing for them. When the prospect of more aid arrives, it is likely that they will accept.
Taiwan has been lobbying Oceanic nations for years -- it is not the result of being opportunistic but the fact that Taiwan is moving toward nationhood. Taiwan would make a significant contribution to Vanuatu's social and economic well-being -- if allowed.
The South Pacific trend of accepting Taiwan into the world community shouldn't be taken out of context. Vanuatu has taken a bold step, simultaneously recognizing both Taiwan and China. They are different, not underdeveloped or backwards.
The pressure both Australia and China have put on this tiny Pacific nation has further divided the government. Since most of the aid money from Australia (A$31 million, or US$23.6 million) is used for the creation of government and bureaucratic positions, threatening aid effects government and bureaucrats.
A crisis has arrived in Vanuatu because at the same time Australia has threatened to cut foreign aid, China has gotten into the government's face about Taiwan, and Taiwan has also offered aid and support to help gain more recognition.
In Taiwan's defense, it is acting in a bid to become accepted by the world community and is familiar with this critical situation. Vanuatu is acting in its own national interest looking for more revenue. It is Taiwan and Vanuatu that are extending friendly relations to one another.
Australia and China are trying to persuade the Vanuatu government to make domestic decisions in accord with Canberra and the new hegemon in the region, Beijing. Australia's course of action always follows the "one China" policy and Australia's threats against Vanuatu will have gained much merit with China and this is important for Australia, regardless of its relationship with Europe.
The Australian government is using the same calculating tactics with Vanuatu that China uses with nations that attempt to have relations with Taiwan. For example, the Australian government has called on Vanuatu to give a series of assurances about its commitment to good government and promise to accept the presence, in Port Vila, of Australian military advisers and police. Why? Vanuatu is at peace.
Additionally, the Chinese hegemony is exceptionally strong, with its "peace-loving people" believing its civilization to be "5000 years old" and encompassing power over all Chinese culture, as a form of property. Australia is only a young intermediate power.
Taiwan's self-determination struggle, I would think, is just as important as Australia's A$31 million and China's US$10 million in aid to Vanuatu. With Taiwan continuing to look for diplomatic relations in this region, and having every right to do so, I'm certain that China and, less so, Australia, will continue to try to stymie Taiwan's efforts -- China to maintain its hegemony in the Taiwan Strait and Australia, in my opinion, to flatter China but under some other pretense. My question in response to Kerr is whether Australia's commitment to the "one China" policy represents good governance?
Christian Lloyd Bell
Victoria, Canada
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.