To divide a people in order to conquer them is an immoral strategy that has endured throughout recorded history. From Alexander the Great to Stalin the Cruel, variants of that strategy have been used to keep nations in thrall to the will of an emperor.
We are now seeing this strategy at work again as Russian President Vladimir Putin stealthily seeks to restore Kremlin supremacy over the lands treated as "lost" when the USSR imploded in 1991. In so overplaying his hand in Ukraine's recent elec-tion, however, Putin clearly revealed to the world his neo-imperialist designs.
In the wake of the euphoric mass protests in Kyiv, Russia's president has since said that he can work with whatever government Ukraine's people choose. These are mere words, for in mind and action Putin does not want anyone to rule Ukraine that he has not put in place. No price is too high to achieve that end, so traditional threats about dividing Ukraine have been used.
I speak as someone who has been on the receiving end of Russian imperialist designs. When Lithuania and then the other Baltic States -- Estonia and Latvia -- which were occupied by Josef Stalin early in World War II, seized their opportunity for freedom in 1990 and 1991, the Kremlin did not sit on its hands. It knew that the rest of Russia's colonies -- the so-called "Soviet republics" -- would want to follow the ungrateful Baltic countries into freedom.
Although Russia's rulers were by then communists in name only, they didn't hesitate to reach for the old Leninist recipes. They began to foster and incite splits and confrontations. They stoked supposed resentments among different national or ethnic communities based on Lenin's idea that even small groups of villages could demand territorial autonomy.
Note the word "territory." The demands were never about normal cultural autonomy as a means of continued identity and supposed self-protection. Only territorial autonomy, it seems, would do.
This way, minorities become easily manipulated majorities. Divide enough, stoke enough resent-ment, and a nation becomes nothing more than a ruined society within a national territory. Arm some of these manufactured minority structures so that they can demand auto-nomy at the barrel of a gun, and you get the kind of chaos the Kremlin can use to reassert its control.
Fortunately, Lithuanians -- as well as Estonians and Latvians -- understood this game. It failed also in Crimea when Russia sought to deploy its old strategy of divide and rule there in 1991. But these defeats did not inspire the Kremlin to abandon the basic strategy. On the contrary, Russia's imperial ambitions persisted, and persistence has paid off. Around the Black Sea, Russia has called into being a series of artificial statelets. Georgia and Moldova have both been partitioned through the creation of criminal mini-states nurtured by the Kremlin and which remain under its military umbrella. Indeed, in the very week that Putin was meddling in Ukraine's presidential election, he was threatening to blockade one of those statelets, Georgia's Abkhazia region, after it had the temerity to vote for a president the Kremlin did not like.
Moldova has been particularly helpless in the face of the Kremlin's imperial designs. A huge Russian garrison remains deployed in Transdneister, where it rules in collaboration with local gangs. Proximity to this lawless territory has helped make Moldova the poorest land in Europe. To the east, Armenia and Azerbaijan were pushed into such bloody confrontation at the Kremlin's instigation that the only way for them to end their ethnic wars was to call in the Russians -- as in Transdneister -- for a kind of "Pax Ruthena."
Now Ukraine's people may face a similar test after supporters of Prime Minister Viktor Yanukovich threatened to seek autonomy should the rightful winner of the country's presidential vote, Viktor Yushchenko, actually become president. Who can doubt that the hand of Russia is behind this? Would Moscow's Mayor Yuri Luzkhov, a loyal creature of Putin, have dared to attend the rally where autonomy was demanded without the sanction of the Kremlin's elected monarch? Indeed, Putin openly claims this part of Ukraine as a Russian "internal matter."
It is to be hoped that Ukraine's Russian-speaking citizens, having witnessed the economic despair -- and sometimes the bloodshed -- caused by the Kremlin's manufactured pro-autonomy movements, will realize that they are being turned into Putin's pawns. The test for Yushchenko and his Orange revolutionaries, as it was for Lithuania's democrats in 1990 to 1991, is to show that democracy does not mean that the majority suppresses any minority. Lithuania passed that test; I am confident that Yushchenko and his team will do so as well. But Europe and the world are also being tested. Russia is passing from being the Russian Federation of former president Boris Yeltsin to a unitary authoritarian regime under Putin and his former KGB colleagues. Europe, the US and the wider world must see Putin's so-called "managed democracy" in its true light, and must stand united against his neo-imperialist dreams.?
The first step is to make Russia honor its binding commitment to the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe, as well as to the Council of Europe, to remove its troops from Moldova and Georgia. Any plans to "defend" Yanukovich and the eastern part of Ukraine by military force must be confronted.
Vytautas Landsbergis, Lithuania's first president after its indepen-dence from the Soviet Union, is now a member of the European Parliament.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry