Democratic politics is a head-counting game. But it is also an art of negotiation and compromise. Both the ruling and opposition camps vowed to win over half of the seats in the legislative elections as if they were competing to see who has the bigger muscles.
The blue camp held a majority in the Fifth Legislative Yuan. Its pledge to maintain that majority showed its lack of confidence. The legislature was a source of chaos over the past few years, as the opposition legislators failed to play their roles well while hurting their images.
Grandstanding is not the way to supervise the government; boycotting is not the way to restrain it. Over the past few years, the pan-blue camp believed that protests were the best supervision. As a consequence, the opposing camps turned the legislative floor into a savage battlefield. Opposition lawmakers often asked absurd questions, and the pan-green ones often answered them absurdly in return.
A legislative majority is necessary for administration, not for supervision. The situation of a majority government and a minority opposition is considered the democratic norm. A minority opposition is still able to function if it participates in politics seriously, and it may become the governing party as it grows. Even if the opposition camp has more seats than the ruling one, it will decline if it does not work hard and restrains the government at all times.
Opposition parties are the pillar of democratic politics. Just like judicial independence and freedom of speech, they are the foundation of any democratic system. An incompetent opposition party is obviously disadvantageous to a democracy. It may be the governing party's victory to defeat such an opponent. But it is not the public's victory.
As the old Chinese saying goes, "An incompetent general will exhaust his army." As the opposition camp's momentum constantly weakens, both Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Lien Chan (連戰) and People First Party (PFP) Chairman James Soong (宋楚瑜) should take responsibility for the blue camp's failures.
The opposition camp would certainly suffer losses as it spins around in the battlefield set up by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP). As a result, the green camp is challenging the system, while the blue camp is protecting it. As the DPP marches forward, the opposition responds conservatively, acting as if they were the government.
The legislative elections were in fact the presidential election in overtime. The political career of each leading character in this game was decided by his or her personality. President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) is calm whenever he is down, and is conceited whenever he is up. On the contrary, both Lien and Soong are calm when they are up, and are at a loss as to what to do when they are down. The two are destined to lose their political careers despite the legislative election results this time.
The green camp will win the legislative majority in practice -- even without having won a majority of seats. But then what? Political reconciliation is only possible when the two camps make room for each other. If politicians trample on one another, it will be unbearable to watch when they come to an open break in friendship.
Democratic politics is not a monologue by a ruling party, and the participation of opposition parties is an indispensable condition. The two camps should not be hostile to each other. Otherwise, what good will it do even if a camp wins the majority while dialogue is still absent?
Antonio Chiang is a former deputy secretary-general of the National Security Council.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry