This year's US presidential election proved that the Republican Party had successfully launched a conservative movement. This movement has advanced radical conservative rhetoric to mobilize the public through conservative think tanks and media. And at the grassroots level, it has effectively run get-out-the-vote drives and maintained good organization through churches and community groups between elections.
Many members of the progressive wing of the Democratic Party think the failure of the party to win this year's presidential election was due to the lack of a clearly defined world view and consistent rhetoric. Senator John Kerry might have proposed many different policies, but they did not add up to a complete picture that could tell voters in which direction he would lead the country. In their grassroots organization and policy think tanks, the Democrats virtually conceded the battlefield to the Republican Party.
Nevertheless, the Democratic mobilization of its grassroots supporters and strong criticism of US President George W. Bush have given Democrats some momentum. The next important step is to harness and direct that energy. In fact, the importance of organization can be seen from the fact that although a majority of blue-collar workers in the south supported the Republican Party, most members of labor unions backed the Democratic Party.
Some Democrats believe that they must rejuvenate the progressive movement of the early 20th century, mobilizing farmers and laborers to fight against unrestrained capitalism. The conservative and centrist groups of the party, however, believe that former president Bill Clinton won two presidential elections because he ran from the center, and so they forsook the mobilization of different social classes.
But as Robert Reich, secretary of labor under Clinton, has pointed out, Clinton's administrative agenda did not proceed smoothly. For example, his failure to implement health care reform was a result in part of an absence of extensive social-based movements supporting it. After two terms of the Clinton administration, we can see more clearly the lack of ideas and organizations that caused the failure of Democratic Party to truly expand its overall grassroots support.
After all, wining an election is not the only objective. More importantly, we must be able to effectively push for a reform agenda. In order to realize that, there must be solid support from society. To establish this support, a president must make his beliefs clear, rather than blur issues.
Members of the progressive wing of the Democratic Party believe the best method to defeat Bush is to firmly maintain Democrats' left-wing stance, and propose long-term social and economic policies in line with the concepts of social justice.
Looking at Taiwan's political parties, the political party closest to minority groups and grassroots movements was the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) when it was still in opposition. Although the DPP has actively operated within the electoral system since the 1990s, its ideology and organization remained similar to that of a civic movement. It championed democracy and localization and fought corruption in order to draw public support.
Since the DPP became the ruling party, localization and nationalism are the only two movements that remain.
The conclusion may be that the DPP is similar to Clinton's Democratic Party, in that after winning power, it has gradually distanced itself from its original supporters. It is therefore unable to lead the country to further development. Shouldn't the DPP, which once represented the aspirations of the public for broad social reform, now think about launching an ideas-driven and well-organized progressive movement?
Chang Tieh-chih is a political analyst in Taiwan.
TRANSLATED BY LIN YA-TI
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.