The re-election of US President George W. Bush has been followed by changes in his cabinet. The most attention has been given to the resignation of Secretary of State Colin Powell and his replacement by National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice.
The New York Times editorial has called her a friend of Bush and pointed out that she should tell Bush what he needs, not what he wants, to hear. Although both Powell and Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld are more experienced than Rice in national security matters, she is closer to Bush than they are.
Rice will be replaced by Deputy National Security Adviser Stephen Hadley, who has a background as a lawyer. Although Bush has called Hadley intelligent and said he possesses good judgement, Hadley has long held a low profile and is known as a reliable bureaucrat who works long hours, without the strategic thinking of a Rice, Brent Scowcroft, Zbigniew Brzezinski or Henry Kissinger.
Although the opinions of Rice and Rumsfeld may differ, Rice might remain the core of the national security team in Bush's second term.
Before Rice was appointed as national security adviser in October 2000, she said that China is not the keeper of the Asian status quo, but rather that it is causing a change in the balance of power. This means problems and trouble, because it is waiting for an opportunity to change the status quo to meet the requirements of its own national interests.
Rice pointed out that the question of whether China will succeed in controlling the Asian power balance will depend on the US response, and that the US, apart from strengthening its cooperation with Japan and South Korea, must pay attention to the role India can play in the regional balance.
Rice advocates involving government, military and the economy when dealing with China. In addition to restraining China's political and military power, trade exchanges should also be used to push for domestic changes in China.
Rice last visited China, Japan and South Korea in July this year, a trip that was focused on resolving the North Korean nuclear crisis. Bush has decided that the US shall withdraw 12,500 of the US troops stationed in South Korea next year, but Rice has stated that the administration's promise to maintain security on the Korean Peninsula will remain unchanged.
During a meeting with Japan's foreign minister, Rice said she hopes that the US and Japan will continue to push for dialogue across the Taiwan Strait, that the Chinese economy will become more integrated with the global economy, and that Beijing will play a more active role in the six-nation talks on the North Korean issue.
When Rice met with the Chinese leadership in Beijing, she made six points. First, she hoped for dialogue between Beijing and Taipei, saying that the US would be willing to take further action if that would help realize such talks.
Second, Beijing's insistence that Taiwan's acceptance of the "one China" principle as a condition for talks was not conducive to cross-strait dialogue.
Third, US arms sales to Taiwan are based on the Taiwan Relations Act, and therefore there is no way of ending such sales.
Fourth, the US will continue to adopt measures to keep the Chen Shui-bian (
Fifth, the US respects the "one China" policy, stands firmly by the three joint Sino-US communiques, and hopes that there will not be any instability in the Taiwan Strait.
Sixth, the US sees China as a partner for cooperation, is willing to maintain high-level dialogue with Beijing, and wants to deepen cooperation in the areas of trade, anti-proliferation and North Korean nuclear arms.
Rice was deeply impressed by Beijing's negative view of Chen's May 20 inauguration speech, which clearly differs from the US view. She also found debate on how to treat Taiwan is still going on in China, and that views varied. While Powell's views could never fully reflect Bush's views, when Rice talks, it carries a different kind of authority.
Rice will continue to push for cross-strait dialogue after taking over as secretary of state. If Taipei continues to show its willingness to enter into dialogue with Beijing on the condition that the "one China" principle is not made a precondition for talks, it should be possible to maintain the current situation without coming under too much pressure from the US.
We must, however, face up to the differences that do exist between the views of Taipei and the US when it comes to the three direct links and amendments to the constitution.
Lin Cheng-yi is director of the Institute of European and American Studies at Academia Sinica.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) trip to China provides a pertinent reminder of why Taiwanese protested so vociferously against attempts to force through the cross-strait service trade agreement in 2014 and why, since Ma’s presidential election win in 2012, they have not voted in another Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate. While the nation narrowly avoided tragedy — the treaty would have put Taiwan on the path toward the demobilization of its democracy, which Courtney Donovan Smith wrote about in the Taipei Times in “With the Sunflower movement Taiwan dodged a bullet” — Ma’s political swansong in China, which included fawning dithyrambs