In a meeting of the Democratic Progressive Party's (DPP) Central Standing Committee, President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) said that with regard to Taiwan's democratic system, people already rule their own house. But with regard to the deeper meaning and quality of democracy, Taiwan still has much to learn before it can set its house in order. He added that Taiwan still has to establish a society in which power and duty are complimentary, and in which freedom and responsibility coexist.
Chen's statements were a response to a discussion about the crisis of social trust in the government and how it is changing. He emphasized that the ethnic problems and social tensions that exist today are largely the result of past rule by an authoritarian government, and he correctly stated that we should adopt an open-minded and liberal mentality to heal these wounds.
After more than 40 years of political repression, it is true that Taiwanese society lacks an organic system of self-rule through which the community can communicate and resolve conflicts. This is why some intellectuals have in recent years sought to promote community building, social education through community colleges and the discussion of social issues in citizens' conferences.
After March 20, Taiwan was on the verge of splitting apart. Looked at in terms of the presidential election, this means that almost half of the nation's voters lack confidence in the incumbent government. Some probably have no faith in it whatsoever. There are many complex reasons for this lack of trust.
Some are dissatisfied with the political achievements of the DPP and some are dissatisfied with having been pushed from power. But it must be recognized that a large part of this distrust is due to ethnic issues, which take the form of a categorical rejection of the government. As this response is the product of both rational and emotional factors, it will be necessary for Taiwanese society to develop into a more healthy state before we can expect their resolution.
So, as Chen has said, Taiwanese have much to learn if they are to set their house with regard to the deeper meaning and quality of their democracy. Put another way, civic awareness has yet to be fully developed in Taiwan.
At this stage, the government will play an important role in determining whether a civil society can be established, especially given the large segment of the population that has little faith in its rule.
In dealing with people who oppose it for irrational reasons, today's government should not adopt the high standards of a fully developed society in which power and duty are complimentary, and in which freedom and responsibility coexist. By using the judiciary to deal with these opponents -- as it has done on more than one occasion recently -- it is doing just that.
In a fully developed democratic society with the rule of law, the judiciary should be the least controversial channel through which to deal with various conflicts in society. But in a society full of distrust, the law often serves only to intimidate, rather than being a means of finding a resolution.
Some members of the government today continue to use rumors and other tactics beyond the scope of the law to attack opponents. So do members of the opposition parties. These tactics go back to the days of the tangwai (outside the Chinese Nationalist Party [KMT]) movement and the early days when the DPP was in opposition.
The response to such measures by the authoritarian government in those days was far more violent than it is today. But we must remember that ever since the Kaohsiung Incident, the country has been developing into a democracy and it regards authoritarianism with an increasing degree of antipathy.
During the authoritarian era, people put their faith in the radicals to right the injustices of the past -- the 228 Incident, the White Terror, the party-state -- and achieve everything the KMT was unable to achieve by creating a free and equal society with no distinctions of class or ethnicity. At that time, the radicals offended many powerful people, but they won the hearts of the common people. There are many who today stand with the opposition who, back in those days, were supporters and participants in the tangwai movement.
The situation is no longer the same, and many people no longer trust the leaders whom they trusted in the past.
If the government now uses the law to oppress its opponents, although it will be able to consolidate its support, it will also consolidate the forces of its opponents. This clear division of friend and enemy will have no benefit to society.
In this chaotic world, people must learn to be masters of their own house. That doesn't mean simply adopting the standards of normal societies, but it does mean leading the Taiwanese people toward achieving such a standard.
If the government wastes its energy engaging in lunchbox-throwing and making a big deal over the insignificant phraseology or actions of individuals, it will simply allow these emotions to keep on bubbling over.
Ku Er-teh is a freelance writer.
Translated by Ian Bartholomew
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under