Prior to 1895, the Qing dynasty held legal claim to Taiwan for a short time. Before the Qing, the nation was controlled by the Portuguese, Dutch and Spanish in succession, and in 1895 it was ceded to Japan and became a Japanese colony.
In 1945, the Republic of China took over Taiwan, and a second period of colonialization began. In 1949, when Chiang Kai-shek (
On the death of then-president Chiang Ching-kuo (
As a result of the presidential election in 2000, Taiwan experienced its first democratic transfer of power with the election of President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), successfully establishing Taiwan as a democratic and sovereign state.
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) under Mao Zedong (毛澤東) established control over China, but its rule never extended to Taiwan. Taiwan had its own territory, citizens, government and diplomatic relations, conforming to all the criteria of a sovereign state as defined by the Treaty of Westphalia of 1648.
So, whether we look at this from a historical perspective, or from the perspective of the current political situation, Taiwan and China are two countries on either side of the Strait. Statements made by Beijing about Taiwan having been an integral part of China since ancient times, as well as its insistence on "one China," are nonsense and nothing more than a myth.
Historically, Taiwan has never been an inalienable part of China, and in the current political circumstances, Taiwan is clearly a sovereign nation and is not a part of China's territory.
China continually emphasizes that it must "reclaim" all its territory. But when the Soviet Union, which China once relied on for support, demanded that Outer Mongolia become independent of Mao's communist empire, the CCP said nothing in protest.
Beijing has constantly emphasized that it needs to wash away the shame of Western imperialist domination of China by reclaiming its imperial dignity and all the territory that had been taken from it by the Western colonial powers.
After World War II, with the exception of Hong Kong and Macao, the territories held by or in which the Western powers and Japan had extraterritorial powers, were all returned to China. Chinese territory won by, czarist Russia and the Soviet Union over the centuries has yet to be returned.
The Treaty of Nerchinsk, signed in 1689, was the beginning of a large-scale acquisition of Chinese territory by imperial Russia. In 1858, the Qing Dynasty was forced to sign the Sino-Russian Aihui Treaty, which ceded territory north of Heilongjiang and east of the Wusuli River to the Russians, an area measuring hundreds of thousands of square kilometers.
In 1900, Cossack forces ravaged Chinese villages on the banks of the Aihui River, massacring over 1,000 people. In 1949, Mao's China was playing second fiddle to Uncle Stalin's Soviet Union, and although China did not recognize the USSR's claim to the territories expropriated during the Czarist period, it dared not ask for their return either. In 1989, shots were fired between China and the Soviet Union over possession of a sandbank in the Amur River.
The Soviet Union is now a thing of the past, and the new Russia has lost much of its former strength. China is a rising power and it is no longer willing to play second fiddle to Russia. So it was quite unbelievable when President Vladimir Putin visited Beijing early last month to negotiate a border treaty with President Hu Jintao (
Deng Xiaoping (
Did this mean he recognized all lands ceded in czarist times as belonging to Russia, including that sandbank in the Amur River? Russian media made much of it, claiming a great diplomatic victory. The Chinese media dealt with it cautiously, and the People's Daily only touched on it lightly, fearing that this territorial loss would reopen old wounds and excite nationalist passions.
When the international media sought clarification on the details of the new treaty between Hu and Putin, Chinese authorities were evasive and refused to divulge specifics. They only said that these were confidential matters and told reporters that everything they needed to know could be found in the People's Daily.
Looking at how this territorial dispute was resolved with China conceding a huge chunk of its "original territory" to Russia, we can see that its attitude toward Taiwan, its military threats and its claims that it must win back "all" its "original territory," are simply a case of bullying a country weaker than itself while toadying to the powerful.
We see a country that acts tough but is hollow inside, in which nationalist sentiment and dignity are only skin deep. We really should not take too much account of China, for paying too much attention will only cause us to frighten ourselves.
What we need is a firm and clear idea of our own national sovereignty and a willingness to walk forward. This is the only path to a bright future.
Chiou Chwei-liang is a visiting professor at Tamkang University.
Translated by Ian Bartholomew
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) trip to China provides a pertinent reminder of why Taiwanese protested so vociferously against attempts to force through the cross-strait service trade agreement in 2014 and why, since Ma’s presidential election win in 2012, they have not voted in another Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate. While the nation narrowly avoided tragedy — the treaty would have put Taiwan on the path toward the demobilization of its democracy, which Courtney Donovan Smith wrote about in the Taipei Times in “With the Sunflower movement Taiwan dodged a bullet” — Ma’s political swansong in China, which included fawning dithyrambs