Why Beijing claims Taiwan
As China has stepped up its rhetoric on Taiwan and steadily increased deployment of the missiles targeting the country, I believe that it is important for Taiwanese, as well as the rest of the world, to know the reasons behind China's obsession with the nation off its southeastern coast.
The Chinese communist regime wants possession of Taiwan for several reasons:
First, surging nationalism. National pride is perhaps the prime motive for annexing Taiwan. Chinese leaders and elites see Taiwan as the last remnant of China's humiliation by Japan and the West during the colonial period, when imperial powers carved China into different spheres of influence.
To many Chinese, the US' continued arms sales to Taiwan are an example of foreign powers perpetrating a historical "wrong" that is hindering China's rise and contributes to its "humiliation."
Second, Taiwan's threat to the Communist Party's legitimacy. By placing the issue of Taiwan so high on its agenda, the Communist Party has linked its own legitimacy to "reunification." Because of the importance placed on brining Taiwan under Beijing's control, Chinese leadership cannot afford to be less than adamant on the Taiwan issue, let alone "lose" Taiwan. As such, Taiwan could become an excuse for dissidents and activists to oppose the Communist Party's "mandate of heaven" to rule China.
Third, spreading separatism. The "loss" of Taiwan could spur dissent in other provinces with separatist tendencies, such as Xingjian and Tibet. Furthermore, foreign influence in Taiwan sets an undesirable precedent for Xingjian and Tibet, where international support for independence already exists.
Fourth, strategic geography. Chinese leaders see Taiwan as a critical link in a chain of US containment that begins in South Korea and Japan. The chain runs south to the Philippines, Thailand and Australia -- nations with which the US has security treaties. Beijing seeks to break that chain and to project power into the Pacific.
Fifth, China has become increasingly dependent upon imported energy resources. An independent Taiwan that could be used as a foreign military base can curtail China's ability to project military power into the Pacific and undermine its energy security.
Sixth, the People's Liberation Army (PLA) as constituency. The annexation of Taiwan has been the PLA's primary mission in the post-Cold War period. The PLA has always placed pressure on civilian leaders, but major events in Taiwan could increase its influence in the decision-making process.
In the event of a failure to "unify the motherland," the PLA would directly place the blame on civilian leaders and weigh in on any post-independence or post-conflict rectification scenario, potentially taking China back to isolation.
Seventh, diverting attention. Some believe that Chinese leaders play up the Taiwan issue to divert attention from China's political struggles and economic difficulties. Although China has just passed through a tense transition from the third generation to the fourth generation of leaders, corruption is still rampant, the banking system is riddled with bad loans, industrial productivity lags, especially in state-owned enterprises, and approximately 125 million people are unemployed.
Eighth, economic capacity. Taiwan has a strong economy and possesses impressive technologies. Absorbing Taiwan's vibrant economy and its technological prowess would be a plus for the troubled Chinese economy.
In summary, for its own political purposes, the Chinese Communist Party has cultivated nationalism among the Chinese people. By making "reunification" with Taiwan a core goal of the party, the regime has effectively linked its own legitimacy with that country.
A failure to carry out "reunification" would certainly present a domestic challenge to the party's continued rule, and perhaps bring about eventual collapse of the communist regime.
Chi Chen
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry