Your editorial ("China's inflexibility blocks progress," Oct. 15, page 8) correctly points out that Beijing's insistence on the "one China" principle before cross-strait talks and Taipei's unwillingness to do so make it impossible for the two sides to resume semi-official talks in the near future.
However, your editorial failed to recognize the dilemma Beijing faces. If it accepts President Chen Shui-bian's (陳水扁) proposal, it would mean that Beijing agrees with Chen's "the Republic of China is Taiwan, and Taiwan is the Republic of China" statement. (Which, by the way, is tantamount to a revision of the Republic of China's Constitution.)
From Beijing's perspective, Chen's speech was aimed at pleasing the US and garnering votes at the year-end legislative elections.
If Beijing agrees to talk now, it will give political points to Chen and his party, which Beijing is absolutely unwilling to do. But if Beijing rejects Chen's proposal as it has, Taiwan and probably the US will blame Beijing for the continued stalemate of cross-strait relations. Neither choice is in Beijing's favor.
Beijing had hoped to wait out Chen, but the strategy has backfired. Even without him, Taiwanese identity is growing rapidly. So China may have to face reality and talk to an increasingly assertive Taiwan. But resolving the cross-strait dispute will require patience, wisdom and sincerity from both sides.
Just as Beijing cannot force Taiwan to accept the "one China" principle now, Taiwan simply cannot force upon China the claim that Taiwan is a sovereign and independent country, or there is one country on each side of the Taiwan Strait, before cross-strait negotiations.
Only when both sides become flexible can serious cross-strait talks be resumed.
Zhu Zhiqun
Bridgeport, Connecticut
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and