Some modest proposals
Recently, I saw several articles published in the editorial section of the Taipei Times regarding how Taiwan is being harassed by China in the international theater.
These harassments consist of everything from the name of Taiwan, China's crackdown on "pro-green" Taiwanese business people and entertainers ("Opening to the Enemy," June 30, page 8) and the repeated campaign against Taiwan's membership in UN ("Long view needed in economic diplomacy," Aug. 28, page 8).
On all of the above issues, may I present my view, to see if the Taiwan government can take quick action in developing a new strategy and implementing it as early as possible for the benefit of the Taiwanese people and their future freedom and happiness.
Perhaps, you might like to forward this letter to President Chen Shui-bian (
Taiwan's name: Recently, we were watching the opening ceremony of the Olympics and saw the Taiwan called "Chinese Taipei." One of the US viewers asked, "Where is the country `Chinese Taipei? Is it in China?'"
From time to time, we also read articles in newspapers and magazines and are very confused about the distinction between the Taiwan-owned China Airlines, China Petroleum, China Steel, China Shipbuilding, and China-owned entities with similar names.
One American even walked into a travel agency asking for a China Airlines flight to Beijing!
Since early years of the Cold War in the 50s and 60s, there have been postal problems between China and Taiwan. Mail gets returned to the sender if he or she uses the name "Republic of China," because such mail is often sent to China instead of Taiwan.
Therefore, we have always used the name "Taiwan" or "Formosa" when the addressee is in Taiwan and tried not to use the word China, to be sure that the mail reaches to the Taiwan addressee.
Chen spoke on behalf of Taiwan's UN bid during his recent interview with members of the UN Correspondents Association.
He said that Taiwan's unfair exclusion from the world body was tantamount to being an "international vagabond" and thus the country was the "victim of political apartheid."
Despite Chen's comments, Taiwan was again rejected this year in its annual bid for UN membership.
The key issue is China's "one China" card. In fact, the "one China" view was inherited from the civil war between the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Chinese Communist Party.
Based on the above facts, Taiwan should not stubbornly try to keep the name "Republic of China" or "ROC" to challenge China for its seat in the UN. Indeed, Taiwan now has not tried to revise the decision of UN, made more than 30 years ago, to have the PRC take Taiwan's seat to represent China.
(The ROC, on behalf of Taiwan, abandoned its UN membership at that time).
As long as Taiwan used the word "China" as part of the country's name, the UN would not and could not accept Taiwan's proposal.
Even so, Chen mentioned the examples of North and South Korea and West and East Germany. But Taiwan and China are not currently on an equal footing in the same way that the Koreas and Germanys are. Therefore, it would be wise for Taiwan to seek a new strategy.
One of the strategies that should be considered and developed is to not bother too much about acquiring UN membership, but instead concentrate the nation's efforts on maintaining a neutral position -- similar to what Switzerland did some years ago.
In doing so, Taiwan should immediately delete the name "ROC" and any other name including the word "China." As Chen said, Taiwan is Taiwan. The name Taiwan or Formosa has been recognized by the international community for centuries.
By settling on the name Taiwan, and working to maintain the country's neutrality, we believe that the UN in time will officially invite Taiwan to join the body as a member, instead of Taiwan lobbying for such membership.
Taiwan's investment in China: In accordance with your editorial entitled "Opening to the enemy" (June 30, page 8), it seems Taiwanese businesspeople should start searching for other locations for their enterprises outside of China.
Why in the world should Taiwan become stuck in China, when China has not appreciated Taiwan's economic contribution in these past years?
In order to relocate Taiwanese enterprises, the government should develop a national strategy, giving financial support to companies searching for good investment destinations in countries who are much friendlier to Taiwan.
Taiwanese businesspeople should also look for places with less political risk in order to receive the government's support.
The government should develop a plan similar to the Japanese government's plan, by supporting enterprises which pursue global markets and competition.
Taiwan, with its well-known high-tech businesses, should find no difficulty achieving world-class status and finding friendlier destinations for investment.
On economic diplomacy: an article published in the Taipei Times on Aug. 28 titled "Long view needed in economic diplomacy" is very perceptive.
The basic mistake made by the government in the past in aid programs to developing countries has been to give gifts instead of loans, like Japan.
The government should change this policy and use the method of the Japanese government on foreign aid programs as soon as possible.
In order to be successful, the government should work closely with Taiwan's private enterprises and use these enterprises as a vehicle to offer financial assistance to needy countries.
By doing so, it would not only enhance Taiwan's international position in making friends both politically and economically, but would also help Taiwan's enterprises enter international competition successfully and protectively.
To achieve the above proposed scenario, the first thing to do is to unite the pan-blue and pan-green camps and work together at this difficult time for the benefit of Taiwan's future prosperity and happiness, and not for personal gain.
After all, Taiwan is Taiwan, as Chen said. Taiwan should form a united front when facing harassment from an outside enemy who aims to harm the country's social welfare, freedom and happiness.
Yoshiko Tio
Houston, Texas
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under