The Sept. 9 van bomb that killed nine Indonesians queuing to enter the Australian Embassy in Jakarta, and at least one suicide bomber, has revived fears that a potent mixture of Indonesian nationalism and Islamic extremism could ignite right on Australia's northern doorstep.
And while the tabloid newspaper driven paranoia of the 1960s, which routinely featured illustrations from Indonesian school atlases naming Australia as South Irian, or a southern province, has not quite returned, there is fear of a truck bomb in a road tunnel, or a backpack bomb attack like that in Madrid.
And as in Spain when the March 11 bombs hit Madrid commuter trains, Australia too is approaching a national election, with the pro-US conservative coalition Prime Minister John Howard being challenged by Labor opposition leader Mark Latham in polls on Oct. 9. And like Spain, Australia is going into its election with a government vowing to keep forces in Iraq and an opposition pledged to pulling them out.
What is focusing Australian minds, now, is that the organization believed behind the Sept. 9 embassy blast is not al-Qaeda nor militants from the Middle East but the very local Jemaah Islamia (JI) already blamed by Indonesia for the 2002 Bali nightclub bombings, which killed 202 people including 88 Australians, the attack on the Jakarta Marriott hotel last year and a string of bombing atrocities in Christian churches.
Translations of JI documents refer to ambitions to create an Islamic super-state in Southeast Asia incorporating parts of Thailand, Malaysia, Indonesia, the Philippines and northern Australia.
And they refer to the building of networks of Islamic communities in the region, under strict Shariah law, as providing the foundations of an Islamic caliphate.
For the moment, just how much sophisticated thinking went into the planning of the Sept. 9 blast remains an open question, but the fallout does appear to have boosted the electoral chances of the Iraq withdrawalist Latham.
In March when he promised to bring home Australian troops from Iraq by Christmas he appeared to commit political suicide. Latham's Iraq withdrawal pledge was denounced as "cutting and running" by Howard and a disastrous weakening of the American alliance which underwrites the very survival of Australia in the event of a threat from Asia.
However, more recently, the political ground had begun to collapse under Howard's feet. The Age newspaper in Melbourne has discovered that of the remaining 850-strong Australian Defense Force contingent only 250 were actually in Iraq and that the government in Canberra was in fact bringing more than a third of them home well before Christmas.
And Latham has stuck to his promise of withdrawal insisting that it is in Australia's interests to shore up its regional defense capability to better combat the threat of terrorist acts occurring on its own soil rather than keeping resources in Iraq.
Just before the Jakarta Embassy attack an analyst at the independent Australian Strategic Policy Institute, Aldo Borgu, said he didn't want to "overstate" the functions of the contingent in Iraq.
"Australians aren't really playing a part in ensuring security for the Iraqi people in the short-term" he said.
"Obviously you can make the argument that our training of the Iraqi armed forces will help to guarantee their security further into the longer term, but certainly we don't play a short -term role there, beyond protecting our own embassy," he said.
But it was the embassy in Jakarta that was bombed, not the one in Baghdad.
Four days after the Jakarta attack Howard and Latham met in the only televised debate of the drawn-out campaign.
Latham denounced the attack as "the act of barbaric people who should be hit as hard as we can hit them" and argued that the invasion of Iraq had little if anything to do with terrorism and nothing to do with the perpetrators of the Bali atrocity.
Although four weeks is an eternity in terms of Australian election campaigns, Latham's emphasis on real threats close to home seems to have rocked a government already battling to maintain the credibility of its involvement all those kilometers away in Iraq.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry