Since taking office, Chinese President Hu Jintao (
"Peaceful rising" is founded on considerations of global governance and comprehensive security. Under this ideological umbrella, it promotes interaction for mutual benefit, focusing on cross-border security issues. So regardless of the real intent behind "peaceful rising," it is certainly in step with trends in international security.
But based on the remark about Taiwan and Sino-US relations, we must acknowledge that Taiwan does not fall within the framework of the "peaceful rising" ideology. If the US supported Taiwan's independence, or if Taiwan declared independence, China would have to sacrifice the last 20 to 30 years of its development and even its hosting of the 2008 Olympics in order to contest the issue militarily. We must recognize this as fundamental.
As manifested in policy implementation, "peaceful rising" is associated with China's projection of "soft power," a concept promoted by US academic Joseph Nye. Soft power is the ability to get what you want by attracting and persuading others to adopt your goals. The emphasis China is putting on soft power can be see in the work of Chinese academics to develop a "national image," as well as the military's use of public opinion, legal and psychological methods to achieve its strategic ends.
But the development of soft power does not necessarily conflict with the development of conventional hard power, and China is in no way neglecting the build-up of its military and economic structures.
For China, the important question is how to ensure balanced development of soft and hard power. China measures the tension between these two types of power and attempts to weigh the relative advantages of using each. As a result it is likely to favor the avoidance of conflict.
But if either of the two obstacles to "peaceful rising" lead to a crisis, then they are likely to use force to resolve the problem.
Nye's soft power is not very different from the soft power proposed by Vice President Annette Lu (呂秀蓮) not long ago. Indeed, the aims of China's peaceful rising are not dissimilar to the situation in which Taiwan currently finds itself.
Moreover, peace is one of President Chen Shui-bian's (
We have to be alert for the real motives behind the theoretical language. But as long as the directions the two countries are taking are mutually consistent -- with both seeking advantage and hoping for more opportunities to interact -- then this is an opportunity that the government should not miss.
Chu Hsin-min is the director of the Mainland Affairs Program at the Prospect Foundation. Chen Ming-hsien is a research assistant at the foundation.
Translated by Ian Bartholomew
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry