Holding a majority in the Legislative Yuan, the pan-blue camp's legislators yesterday ignored public opinion and vetoed the Cabinet's request to reconsider the "March 19 Shooting Truth Investigation Special Committee Statute" (
Under such circumstances, the nation's political situation can hardly stabilize, in light of the vitriolic confrontation between the ruling and opposition parties.
Every Taiwanese person wants to know the truth behind the mysterious shooting of the president and vice president on the eve of the presidential election, and no one is opposed to a detailed investigation of the case. The problem is this: the organization responsible for the investigation has to be reasonable, and the stipulation of the statute regarding the investigation can violate neither the Constitution nor basic human rights. Only then will the "truth" reached by the committee be credible and convincing. Otherwise, any investigation that violates the principles of justice will become a political disaster.
After the bill creating the Special Committee was rammed through the legislature by the pan-blues last month, the Taipei Society, the Judicial Reform Foundation, the Taiwan Law Society and the Prosecutors' Reform Association all issued comments, saying that many articles in the statute violate democratic and constitutional principles.
In the discussions during this time, both the pan-green and pan-blue camps agreed that the recommendation of committee members based on proportional party representation in the legislature would facilitate political interference; and everyone was worried that the different parties would try to meddle with the truth investigation committee, not in an effort to uncover the truth about the shooting, but rather to turn the committee into another platform for inter-party struggles in the run-up to the year-end legislative elections.
In addition, we all know that proportional representation means that the pan-blue camp will hold the upper hand in the committee, since they have a legislative majority. That would mean that the initial organizational structure starts out as unfair.
How could that be acceptable to the green camp? To begin with, truth cannot be decided through proportional party representation. Small wonder that legislators from the Democratic Progressive Party and the Taiwan Solidarity Union at an early stage declared that they would never participate in this truth investigation committee, which would make it purely a "blue committee" made up of members of the pan-blue camp.
Why not simply set up a commission that is not susceptible to political manipulation? After all, systems are more dependable than individuals.
Chen Jui-jen (
He went on to say that proportional representation would make prosecutors tools of political parties, and also violate the judiciary's right of judgement. This not only violates the five-branch separation of powers embodied in the Constitution, but turns prosecutors into weapons in a struggle for power between political parties.
If the committee said that President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) staged the assassination attempt, he might not only have to step down, but would most likely be sent to prison as well. Yet if the judgement of the special committee does not convince everyone, then Taiwan is likely to descend into chaos.
Is this the real aim of the pan-blue camp?
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry